The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The cigarette pack as image: new evidence from tobacco industry documents
Open accessAbstract
Objectives: To gain an understanding of the role of pack design in tobacco marketing. Methods: A search of tobacco company document sites using a list of specified search terms was undertaken during November 2000 to July 2001. Results: Documents show that, especially in the context of tighter restrictions on conventional avenues for tobacco marketing, tobacco companies view cigarette packaging as an integral component of marketing strategy and a vehicle for (a) creating significant in-store presence at the point of purchase, and (b) communicating brand image. Market testing results indicate that such imagery is so strong as to influence smoker's taste ratings of the same cigarettes when packaged differently. Documents also reveal the careful balancing act that companies have employed in using pack design and colour to communicate the impression of lower tar or milder cigarettes, while preserving perceived taste and “satisfaction”. Systematic and extensive research is carried out by tobacco companies to ensure that cigarette packaging appeals to selected target groups, including young adults and women. Conclusions: Cigarette pack design is an important communication device for cigarette brands and acts as an advertising medium. Many smokers are misled by pack design into thinking that cigarettes may be “safer”. There is a need to consider regulation of cigarette packaging.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The path to Australia's tobacco health warnings
Borland, R., & Hill, D. (1997) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1997.tb03674.x · Cited by 32
Cited by
Health warning messages on tobacco products: a review
Hammond, D. (2011) · Tobacco Control · doi:10.1136/tc.2010.037630 · Cited by 1,162
Pictorial cigarette pack warnings: a meta-analysis of experimental studies
Noar, S. M., Hall, M. G., Francis, D. B., Ribisl, K. M., Pepper, J. K., & Brewer, N. T. (2016) · Tobacco Control · doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051978 · Cited by 674
The impact of tobacco promotion at the point of sale: A systematic review
Paynter, J., & Edwards, R. (2009) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1093/ntr/ntn002 · Cited by 321
Comprehensive tobacco marketing restrictions: promotion, packaging, price and place
Henriksen, L. (2012) · Tobacco Control · doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050416 · Cited by 312
Tobacco Denormalization and Industry Beliefs Among Smokers from Four Countries
Hammond, D., Fong, G. T., Zanna, M. P., Thrasher, J. F., & Borland, R. (2006) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2006.04.004 · Cited by 256
Metadata
- Authors
- Wakefield, M., Morley, C., Horan, J. K., & Cummings, K. M.
- Venue
- Tobacco Control
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- suppl 1
- Pages
- i73-i80
- ISSN
- 0964-4563 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3318
- OpenAlex
- W2164301943
- Cited by
- 439
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The cigarette pack as image: new evidence from tobacco industry documents. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/tc.11.suppl_1.i73
- The paper
- Wakefield, M., Morley, C., Horan, J. K., & Cummings, K. M. (2002). The cigarette pack as image: new evidence from tobacco industry documents. Tobacco Control. https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.11.suppl_1.i73
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.