Cited by 92Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesGlobal Public Health Policies and Epidemiology

Impact of UK policy initiatives on use of medicines to aid smoking cessation

Open access
West, R, DiMarino, M E, Gitchell, J, McNeill, A·2005·Tobacco Control

Abstract

Context:Increasing the use of effective smoking cessation aids could in principle have a substantial public health impact. The UK government has undertaken several major policy initiatives to try to increase usage of smoking cessation medicines. It is important to evaluate what effect, if any, these have had to inform future policy in the UK and internationally. Objective:This study used sales data to examine the impact of government initiatives to increase access to smoking cessation medicines. Design:Information about prescription and non-prescription sales (1999–2002) was obtained. Estimates of utilisation were compared with findings from the Office of National Statistics (ONS) omnibus surveys. The effects of policy initiatives (making the medicines reimbursable and making them available on general sale outside pharmacies) were assessed by means of time series analysis. In addition a new nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) product (a nicotine lozenge) was launched and the effect of this on total utilisation was assessed. Results:Making bupropion, and subsequently nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), reimbursable had a major impact in medication usage; the estimated increase in each case was more than 80 000 “treatment weeks” purchased per month. In addition, introduction of a nicotine lozenge increased total utilisation and did not detract from usage of other medicines. According to both the sales and the survey data, the proportion of smokers using medicines to aid smoking cessation more than doubled from 8–9% in 1999 to 17% in 2002. The ONS surveys showed no increase in the proportions of smokers making quit attempts and so the effects were solely on the proportions of quit attempts that were aided by medication. Conclusions:In the UK, making smoking cessation medicines reimbursable led to a large increase in utilisation. While the effect on smoking prevalence would be too small to be detected in national surveys it could have a substantial public health impact.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/tc.2004.008649

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Concurrent NRT use among smokers, either for temporary abstinence or for cutting down, has remained relatively stable since 2002 and mostly reflects short-term use.

    “Indeed, concurrent NRT use among smokers, either for temporary abstinence or for cutting down, has remained relatively stable since 2002 109 and mostly reflects short-term use.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. West R, McNeill A, Raw M. National smoking cessation guidelines for health professionals: an update. Thorax 2000;55:987-99.
  2. Anon. State medicaid coverage for tobacco-dependence treatments -United States, 1994-2002. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2004;53:54-7.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
West, R., DiMarino, M. E., Gitchell, J., & McNeill, A.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Pinney Associates (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
West, R
Venue
Tobacco Control
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2005-05-27
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
166-171
ISSN
  • 0964-4563 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3318
OpenAlex
W2000496248
Cited by
92
References
24
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Tobacco Control (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Keywords
nicotine replacement therapy, bupropion, health policy, reimbursement, over-the-counter availability, nicotine lozenges, sales data, quit attempts, tobacco control, United Kingdom
MeSH terms
Drug Utilization, United Kingdom, Health Policy, Humans, Nicotine, Smoking Cessation, Bupropion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review