The DOI matches its Crossref record; 91 of the 91 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Population tobacco control interventions and their effects on social inequalities in smoking: systematic review
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To assess the effects of population tobacco control interventions on social inequalities in smoking. Data sources: Medical, nursing, psychological, social science and grey literature databases, bibliographies, hand-searches and contact with authors. Study selection: Studies were included (n = 84) if they reported the effects of any population-level tobacco control intervention on smoking behaviour or attitudes in individuals or groups with different demographic or socioeconomic characteristics. Data extraction: Data extraction and quality assessment for each study were conducted by one reviewer and checked by a second. Data synthesis: Data were synthesised using graphical (“harvest plot”) and narrative methods. No strong evidence of differential effects was found for smoking restrictions in workplaces and public places, although those in higher occupational groups may be more likely to change their attitudes or behaviour. Smoking restrictions in schools may be more effective in girls. Restrictions on sales to minors may be more effective in girls and younger children. Increasing the price of tobacco products may be more effective in reducing smoking among lower-income adults and those in manual occupations, although there was also some evidence to suggest that adults with higher levels of education may be more price-sensitive. Young people aged under 25 are also affected by price increases, with some evidence that boys and non-white young people may be more sensitive to price. Conclusions: Population-level tobacco control interventions have the potential to benefit more disadvantaged groups and thereby contribute to reducing health inequalities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health care
Campbell, N. C., Murray, E., Darbyshire, J., Emery, J., Farmer, A., Griffiths, F., Guthrie, B., Lester, H., Wilson, P., & Kinmonth, A. L. (2007) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39108.379965.be · Cited by 1,331
Using meta ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: a worked example
Britten, N., Campbell, R., Pope, C., Donovan, J., Morgan, M., & Pill, R. (2002) · Journal of Health Services Research & Policy · doi:10.1258/135581902320432732 · Cited by 1,110
Jha, P., Peto, R., Zatonski, W., Boreham, J., Jarvis, M. J., & Lopez, A. D. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)68975-7 · Cited by 863
Independent inquiry into inequalities in health report
Acheson, D. (1998) · Stationery Office eBooks · Cited by 774
The problem of appraising qualitative research
Dixon-Woods, M. (2004) · Quality and Safety in Health Care · doi:10.1136/qshc.2003.008714 · Cited by 653
Briss (2000) · doi:10.1016/s0749-3797(99)00119-1 · Cited by 565
Rational Addictive Behavior and Cigarette Smoking
Chaloupka, F. (1990) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w3268 · Cited by 554
Rational Addictive Behavior and Cigarette Smoking
Chaloupka, F. (1991) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261776 · Cited by 545
The effects of excise taxes and regulations on cigarette smoking
Wasserman, J., Manning, W. G., Newhouse, J. P., & Winkler, J. D. (1991) · Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1016/0167-6296(91)90016-g · Cited by 479
Townsend, J., Roderick, P., & Cooper, J. (1994) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.309.6959.923 · Cited by 468
Cited by
Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care
Tacconelli, E. (2010) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(10)70065-7 · Cited by 3,245
O'Neill, J., Tabish, H., Welch, V., Petticrew, M., Pottie, K., Clarke, M., Evans, T., Pardo Pardo, J., Waters, E., White, H., et al. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.08.005 · Cited by 1,657
Self-citationSocioeconomic status and smoking: a review
Hiscock, R., Bauld, L., Amos, A., Fidler, J. A., & Munafò, M. (2012) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06202.x · Cited by 1,572
What types of interventions generate inequalities? Evidence from systematic reviews
Lorenc, T., Petticrew, M., Welch, V., & Tugwell, P. (2013) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech-2012-201257 · Cited by 927
Self-citationHealth for Everyone?: Social Inequalities in Health and Health Systems
OECD (2019) · OECD Health Policy Studies · doi:10.1787/3c8385d0-en · Cited by 755
Metadata
- Authors
- Thomas, S., Fayter, D., Misso, K., Ogilvie, D., Petticrew, M., Sowden, A., Whitehead, M., & Worthy, G.
- Venue
- Tobacco Control
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2008-04-21
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 230-237
- ISSN
- 0964-4563 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3318
- OpenAlex
- W2105667575
- Cited by
- 347
- References
- 91
- FWCI
- 1.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Population tobacco control interventions and their effects on social inequalities in smoking: systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/tc.2007.023911
- The paper
- Thomas, S., Fayter, D., Misso, K., Ogilvie, D., Petticrew, M., Sowden, A., Whitehead, M., & Worthy, G. (2008). Population tobacco control interventions and their effects on social inequalities in smoking: systematic review. Tobacco Control. https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2007.023911
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.