The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rational Addictive Behavior and Cigarette Smoking
Open accessAbstract
After a discussion of cigarette smoking in the context of the Becker- Murphy (1988) model of rational addictive behavior, demand equations are derived accounting for the tolerance, reinforcement, and withdrawal characteristic of addictive consumption.These are contrasted to equations developed under the competing hypotheses that smoking is not addictive or that cigarettes are addictive but individuals behave myopically.The demand equations are estimated using adults interviewed as part of the Second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.Estimates support the assumptions that cigarette smoking is an addictive behavior and that individuals do not behave myopically.Long run price elasticities of demand, fall in the range from -0.38 to -0.27.These estimates suggest that increased excise taxation would be an effective way of reducing cigarette smoking.Estimates for samples of current and ever smokers indicate that price increases would lead to lower cigarette consumption among both groups.Finally, the Becker-Murphy model's implications concerning the rate of tine preference and addictive consumption are tested by estimating the demand for cigarettes separately using samples based on age or education.Less educated and younger individuals are found to behave much more myopically than their more educated or older counterparts.Additionally, more addicted (myopic) individuals are found to be more responsive, in the long run, to changes in price than less addicted (myopic) individuals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ulysses and the Sirens: A theory of imperfect rationality
Elster, J. (1977) · Social Science Information · doi:10.1177/053901847701600501 · Cited by 104
Cited by
Understanding differences in health behaviors by education
Cutler, D. M., & Lleras-Muney, A. (2010) · Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2009.10.003 · Cited by 1,920
Avoidable global cancer deaths and total deaths from smoking
Jha, P. (2009) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2703 · Cited by 522
Hopkins, D. P., Briss, P. A., Ricard, C. J., Husten, C. G., Carande-Kulis, V. G., Fielding, J. E., Alao, M. O., McKenna, J. W., Sharp, D. J., Harris, J. R., et al. (2001) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0749-3797(00)00297-x · Cited by 453
Chapter 29 The economics of smoking
Chaloupka, F. J., & Warner, K. E. (2000) · Handbook of Health Economics · doi:10.1016/s1574-0064(00)80042-6 · Cited by 398
Self-citationChaloupka, F. J., Cummings, K. M., Morley, C., & Horan, J. (2002) · Tobacco Control · doi:10.1136/tc.11.suppl_1.i62 · Cited by 342
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Chaloupka, F.
- Venue
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- Published
- 1990-02
- OpenAlex
- W2890281544
- Cited by
- 554
- References
- 1
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rational Addictive Behavior and Cigarette Smoking. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3386/w3268
- The paper
- Chaloupka, F. (1990). Rational Addictive Behavior and Cigarette Smoking. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w3268
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.