Cited by 71Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeMedical Practices and Rehabilitation

Health status measurement: sensitivity of the self-reported Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ-SR) in pulmonary rehabilitation

Open access
Williams, J E A·2003·Thorax

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A self-reported CRQ (CRQ-SR) has recently been developed and found to be a reproducible and reliable measure of health status. This study explores both the sensitivity of the CRQ-SR and relative sensitivity compared with the conventional interviewer led CRQ (CRQ-IL) in patients undergoing pulmonary rehabilitation. METHODS: Eighty patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who had been referred for pulmonary rehabilitation completed the CRQ-SR at initial assessment and at the end of the 7 week programme. A further 35 patients completed both the CRQ-SR and the CRQ-IL, administered 1 week apart, before starting rehabilitation and again at the end of the programme. RESULTS: There were large statistically and clinically significant changes in mean score per dimension following rehabilitation in all dimensions of the CRQ-SR (dyspnoea mean difference 0.87 (95% CI 0.61 to 1.14); fatigue 0.76 (0.53 to 1.0); emotion 0.60 (0.35 to 0.86); mastery 0.76 (0.52 to 1.0); p<0.001). Similar results were found in the comparison of the sensitivity of the CRQ-SR and the CRQ-IL, with large changes in mean score per dimension following rehabilitation for both versions of the questionnaire (p<0.005). No significant differences were seen in the magnitude of change between the two formats of the questionnaire (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: The self-reported CRQ is as sensitive to change as the interviewer led CRQ in patients undergoing pulmonary rehabilitation but has the advantage of being less time consuming to administer.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/thorax.58.6.515

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire-Self reported is a valid and reliable measure of health status in patients with COPD.

    “The CRQ-SR is a self-reported measure of health status shown to be a valid and reliable in patients with COPD [32].”

    From Can we identify patients with different illness schema following an acute exacerbation of COPD: A cluster analysis (2014) · cites this paper as [32]

    The Abstract describes the CRQ-SR as a reproducible and reliable measure of health status, and the Discussion finds it sensitive to change in patients with COPD undergoing pulmonary rehabilitation. Our copy does not establish its validity more broadly, so the validity part of the claim is not supported. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williams, J. E. A.
Affiliations
Glenfield Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Williams, J E A
Venue
Thorax
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2003-06-01
Volume
58
Issue
6
Pages
515-518
ISSN
0040-6376 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2016518505
Cited by
71
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Thorax (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Keywords
Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire, self-rated health, pulmonary rehabilitation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, questionnaire sensitivity, interviewer-administered questionnaire, dyspnea, fatigue, emotional impact, mastery, health-related quality of life
MeSH terms
Aged, Chronic Disease, Female, Health Status, Humans, Lung Diseases, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sensitivity and Specificity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review