Cited by 43Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchSleep and related disordersRespiratory Support and Mechanisms

Continuous positive airway pressure titration for obstructive sleep apnoea: automatic versus manual titration

Open access
McArdle, N., Singh, B., Murphy, M., Gain, K. R., Maguire, C., Mutch, S., Hillman, D. R.·2010·Thorax

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Manual laboratory continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) titration for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is costly, time intensive and delays access to treatment. Automatic positive airway pressure (APAP) titration has the potential to reduce cost and improve access to treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical efficacy and costs of APAP titration compared with manual titration in moderate-severe OSA. METHODS: Patients with moderate-severe OSA (apnoea/hypopnoea index >15 and Epworth Sleepiness Score > or = 8) who were free of co-morbidities that could impair APAP titration were eligible. 249 participants were randomised to manual titration, home APAP or laboratory APAP titration to determine a fixed pressure for CPAP. Clinical and direct cost outcomes were assessed after 4 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Average nightly CPAP use, subjective sleepiness, SF36 quality of life, Trails A and B cognitive function and polysomnographic outcomes were similar among the per-protocol groups. Non-hypertensive patients had a lower resting heart rate (and greater reduction in heart rate) at 4 weeks after laboratory APAP titration compared with home APAP titration. Costs per patient were highest in manual (AU$817.84), followed by laboratory (AU$647.56) and home (AU$132.09) APAP titration. An intention-to-treat analysis confirmed the effectiveness of APAP titration compared with manual titration in the standard clinical setting. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with moderate-severe OSA without serious co-morbidities, outcomes at 1 month indicate that APAP titration is more cost-effective than manual laboratory titration to determine an appropriate pressure for CPAP for long-term use; with the largest savings occurring in the home APAP patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/thx.2009.116756

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [1]1. Sleep disordered breathing on October 9, 2023 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://thorax.bmj.com/ Thorax: first published as 10.1136/thx.2009.116756 on 13 July 2010. Downloaded from Thorax 2010;65:606e611. doi:10.1136/thx.2009.116756 Sleep disordered breathing on October 9, 2023 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://thorax.bmj.com/ Thorax: first published as 10.1136/thx.2009.116756 on 13 July 2010. Downloaded from Sleep disordered breathing on October 9, 2023 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://thorax.bmj.com/ Thorax: first published as 10.1136/thx.2009.116756 on 13 July 2010. Downloaded from Thorax 2010;65:606e611. doi:10.1136/thx.2009.116756 Sleep disordered breathing on October 9, 2023 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://thorax.bmj.com/ Thorax: first published as 10.1136/thx.2009.116756 on 13 July 2010. Downloaded from REFERENCES

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McArdle, N., Singh, B., Murphy, M., Gain, K. R., Maguire, C., Mutch, S., & Hillman, D. R.
Affiliations
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
  • Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
McArdle, N.
Venue
Thorax
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2010-07-01
Volume
65
Issue
7
Pages
606-611
ISSN
0040-6376 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2154124810
Cited by
43
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Thorax (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
ResMed
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Keywords
obstructive sleep apnea, CPAP titration, automatic positive airway pressure, cost-effectiveness, sleepiness, quality of life, cognitive function, heart rate, treatment access
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Pressure, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Severity of Illness Index, Treatment Outcome, Health Care Costs, Polysomnography, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review