Cited by 46Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchSleep and related disordersRespiratory Support and Mechanisms

Comparison of CPAP Titration at Home or the Sleep Laboratory in the Sleep Apnea Hypopnea Syndrome

Cross, Melanie D., Vennelle, Marjorie, Engleman, Heather M., White, Sandra, Mackay, Thomas W., Twaddle, Sarah, Douglas, Neil J.·2006·Sleep

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) is conventionally started after in-laboratory overnight titration. This use of sleep laboratory space is both costly and limits access for diagnostic studies. This study aimed to evaluate whether automated CPAP titration in the home produced patient outcomes equal to those following laboratory-based automated CPAP titration. The main outcomes were Epworth Sleepiness Scale score, objective daytime sleepiness (Oxford SLEep Resistance test or OSLER test), and CPAP use; we also performed quality-of-life questionnaires: Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire and SF-36. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, single-blind, parallel-group, controlled trial SETTING: Regional sleep center and patients' homes. PATIENTS: Two hundred CPAP-naïve patients with OSAHS requiring CPAP treatment. INTERVENTIONS: One hundred patients were randomly assigned to a standard 1-night in-hospital CPAP titration and 100 to 3 nights' home CPAP titration and then issued with fixed pressure CPAP. Data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The patient groups did not differ at baseline. The CPAP pressures defined at titration (mean+/- SEM: 10.6+/-0.2, 10.4+/-0.2 cm H20, p = .19), number of mask leaks, and initial acceptance rates were similar in the sleep-laboratory and home-titrated groups. At 3-month follow-up, there was no significant difference in CPAP use (mean+/-SEM: 4.39+/-0.25, 4.38+/-0.25 h/night; p > .9), Epworth Sleepiness Scale score (9.5+/-0.5, 8.5+/-0.5, p = .14), OSLER, Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire, or SF-36 between the sleep-laboratory and home-titrated groups. CONCLUSIONS: Home-based automated CPAP titration is as effective as automatic in-laboratory titrations in initiating treatment for OSAHS.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/sleep/29.11.1451

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Meta-analysis of RCTs demonstrated no clinically significant difference in sleep-related quality of life when comparing PAP initiation using home APAP versus an in-laboratory titration.

    “A meta-analysis combining 2 RCTs measuring sleep-related QOL with FOSQ, 175,176 2 RCTs measuring sleep-related QOL with SAQLI, 178,182 and one RCT 180 measuring both FOSQ and SAQLI demonstrated no clinically significant difference in sleep-related QOL when comparing PAP initiation using home APAP versus an in-laboratory titration”

    From Treatment of Adult Obstructive Sleep Apnea With Positive Airway Pressure: An American Academy of Sleep Medicine Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and GRADE Assessment (2019) · cites this paper as [175]

    The Three-Month Assessment (p. 2) identifies this as an RCT that measured sleep-related quality of life with FOSQ, and the Results (p. 3) report no statistical difference between home and laboratory titration. The paper measured SF-36, not SAQLI, alongside FOSQ. It reports its own trial, not the cited meta-analysis or a test of clinical significance. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Two RCTs demonstrated no clinically significant difference in general quality of life as assessed by the SF-36 mental component summary, physical component summary, and vitality scores when comparing home APAP versus an in-laboratory titration.

    “Two RCTs 175,180 demonstrated no clinically significant difference in general QOL as assessed by the SF-36 mental component summary, physical component summary, and vitality scores when comparing home APAP versus an in-laboratory titration”

    From Treatment of Adult Obstructive Sleep Apnea With Positive Airway Pressure: An American Academy of Sleep Medicine Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and GRADE Assessment (2019) · cites this paper as [175]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Six studies evaluated cost, of which three reported a slightly reduced cost for a combined home-based diagnostic and treatment pathway, and three reported a lower cost for home APAP compared to in-laboratory titrations.

    “Six studies evaluated cost, 35,175,177,[179][180][181] of which three 35,180,181 reported a slightly reduced cost for a combined home-based diagnostic and treatment pathway, and three 175,177,179 reported a lower cost for home APAP compared to in-laboratory titrations.”
  • Out-of-pocket costs to patients may be lower with either split or whole-night in-laboratory PAP titration due to payor coverage policies in certain instances.

    “Despite the greater cost-effectiveness of homebased APAP initiation, 175,177,179 out-of-pocket costs to patients may be lower with either split or whole-night in-laboratory PAP titration due to payor coverage policies in certain instances.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [3]3. Ronald J, Delaive K, Roos L, Manfreda J, Bahammam A, Kryger MH. Health care utilisation in the 10 years prior to diagnosis in the obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome patients. Sleep 1999;22:225-9.
  2. [7]7. Berkani M, Lofasa F, Chouaid C,et al. CPAP Titration by an autoCPAP device based on snoring detection: a clinical trial and economic considerations. Eur Respir J 1998;12:759-763.
  3. [16]16. Fitzpatrick Michael F, Alloway CED, et al. Can patients with obstuctive sleep apnoea titrate their own continuous positive airway pressure? Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003;16:716-22.
  4. [19]19. McArdle N, Devereux G, Heidarnejad H, Engleman HM, Douglas NJ. Long term use of CPAP therapy for sleep apnea/hypopnoea syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;159:1108-14.
  5. [21]21. Hoy CJ, Vennelle M, Kingshott RN, Engleman HM, Douglas NJ. Can intensive support improve continuous positive airway pressure use in patients with the sleep apnoea hypopnoea syndrome? Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;159:1096-100.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cross, M. D., Vennelle, M., Engleman, H. M., White, S., Mackay, T. W., Twaddle, S., & Douglas, N. J.
Affiliations
Edinburgh Royal Infirmary (GB)
Venue
Sleep
Published
2006-11
Volume
29
Issue
11
Pages
1451-1455
ISSN
  • 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9109
OpenAlex
W1901193752
Cited by
46
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • SLEEP (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Keywords
obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome, CPAP titration, continuous positive airway pressure, daytime sleepiness, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, CPAP adherence, quality of life
MeSH terms
Calibration, Feasibility Studies, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Home Care Services, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Telephone, Single-Blind Method, Patient Satisfaction, Polysomnography, Equipment Failure Analysis, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review