Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 378

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Bronchial responsiveness to histamine: relationship to diurnal variation of peak flow rate, improvement after bronchodilator, and airway calibre

Open access
Ryan, G, Latimer, K., Dolovich, J, Hargreave, F.·1982·Thorax

Abstract

Features of asthma include increases in both bronchial responsiveness and variability of airflow rates. We examined the relationship between bronchial responsiveness to histamine and the variation of peak expiratory flow rate (PFR) during the day and in response to salbutamol (200 μg), and the initial FEV1 at the time of the histamine test and FEV1 response to salbutamol. Bronchial responsiveness to histamine was expressed as the provocation concentration causing a fall in FEV1 of 20% (PC20). PC20 ranged between 13·9 and 130 mg/ml in nonasthmatic subjects, between 10·5 and 59·9 mg/ml in five asymptomatic asthmatics, and between 0·03 and 20·8 mg/ml in 27 asthmatics with symptoms controlled by medication. The lower the PC20 (the greater the bronchial responsiveness) the lower the morning PFR (r = 0·79), the greater the increase in PFR after salbutamol (morning r = −0·75, evening r = −0·80), and the greater the difference between the highest and lowest PFR each day (r = −0·81). Measurements of PFR were abnormal, compared with those in nonasthmatic subjects, in all subjects with a PC20 less than 2 mg/ml—that is, moderate or severe increase in nonspecific bronchial responsiveness—and in none with a PC20 greater than 21 mg/ml—that is, normal responsiveness; five of nine asthmatics with controlled symptoms had abnormal PFR measurements when PC20 was between 2 and 21 mg/ml—that is, mild hyperresponsiveness. In contrast, FEV1 at the time of the histamine test was greater than 80% predicted in all subjects with a PC20 greater than 2 mg/ml and was not less than this in 10 of 18 subjects with a PC20 less than 2 mg/ml. When improvement in FEV1 was 20% or more after salbutamol, the PC20 was usually moderately or severely increased (less than 0·4 mg/ml). The results identify a close relationship between nonspecific bronchial responsiveness to histamine and the variability in flow rates which occurs spontaneously and after bronchodilator. In addition, they raise the possibility that increased airflow obstruction in asthma may be a consequence of increased responsiveness.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/thx.37.6.423

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 378

Metadata

Authors
Ryan, G., Latimer, K., Dolovich, J., & Hargreave, F.
Venue
Thorax
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1982-06-01
Volume
37
Issue
6
Pages
423-429
ISSN
0040-6376 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1975790353
Cited by
378
References
0
FWCI
10.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bronchial responsiveness to histamine: relationship to diurnal variation of peak flow rate, improvement after bronchodilator, and airway calibre. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/thx.37.6.423
The paper
Ryan, G., Latimer, K., Dolovich, J., & Hargreave, F. (1982). Bronchial responsiveness to histamine: relationship to diurnal variation of peak flow rate, improvement after bronchodilator, and airway calibre. Thorax. https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.37.6.423

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.