Cited by 53Global Public Health Policies and EpidemiologySmoking Behavior and CessationPublic Health Policies and Education

FCTC followed by accelerated implementation of tobacco advertising bans

Open access
Hiilamo, Heikki, Glantz, Stanton·2017·Tobacco Control

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate changes in countries' enacting advertising bans after the effect of ratifying the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC). METHODS: We compared adoption of advertising bans on five areas (TV and radio, print media, billboards, point-of-sale, sponsorship) in countries that did versus did not ratify the FCTC, accounting for years since the ratification of the Convention. RESULTS: On average, passage of complete advertising bans accelerated after FCTC ratification. The development was strongest among lower middle-income countries. Lack of state capacity was associated with lower likelihood of countries implementing complete advertising bans. Implementation of complete advertising bans slowed after 2007. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of FCTC Article 13 was followed by increased progress towards complete advertising bans, but progress is incomplete, especially among low-income countries. Low-income countries need comprehensive support to implement FCTC as part of a broad effort to reinvigorate progress on global implementation of the FCTC. Enforcing complete bans requires constant monitoring and attacking of tobacco industry efforts to circumvent them.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053007

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Since 2005, the FCTC has redefined global, regional, and national approaches to tobacco control and policy.

    “Since 2005, the year when the FCTC entered into force, it has redefined global, regional, and national approaches to tobacco control and policy.50, 51”

    From Smoking prevalence and attributable disease burden in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015 (2017) · cites this paper as [51]

    The Conclusions (page not provided) report that FCTC ratification was followed by accelerated adoption of national tobacco advertising bans, supporting a change in one area of tobacco-control policy. The paper does not establish the broader claim that the FCTC redefined global, regional, and national approaches to tobacco control as a whole. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Properly implemented FCTC policies significantly reduce tobacco consumption.

    “Properly implemented FCTC policies significantly reduce tobacco consumption.7–10”

    From Role of stakeholders in Nigeria’s tobacco control journey after the FCTC: lessons for tobacco control advocacy in low-income and middle-income countries (2019) · cites this paper as [8]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) states that comprehensive bans on tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship reduce tobacco use, especially among young people. But the paper's Conclusions (page unavailable) concern accelerated adoption of those bans, not a measured reduction in consumption. It does not establish a significant consumption reduction from properly implemented FCTC policies generally. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The transnational tobacco control network supported the creation of the WHO FCTC and assisted governments in implementing it, which has accelerated the adoption of tobacco control regulations, including pictorial health warning labels on cigarette packages.

    “This network supported the creation of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC)15 and assisted governments in implementing it,16–19 which has accelerated the adoption of tobacco control regulations,20–23 including pictorial health warning labels (HWLs) on cigarette packages.24”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. [2]Nagler RH Viswanath K Implementation and research priorities for FCTC articles 13 and 16: tobacco advertising, promotion, and sponsorship and sales to and by minors Nicotine Tob Res 2013 15 832 46 23291641 PMC3601914
  2. [6]Sanders-Jackson AN Song AV Hiilamo H Effect of the framework convention on tobacco control and voluntary industry health warning labels on passage of mandated cigarette warning labels from 1965 to 2012: transition probability and event history analyses Am J Public Health 2013 103 2041 7 24028248 PMC3795937
  3. [8]Uang R Hiilamo H Glantz SA Accelerated adoption of smoke-free laws after ratification of the World Health Organization framework convention on tobacco control Am J Public Health 2016 106 166 71 26562125 PMC4689638
  4. [9]Savell E Gilmore AB Fooks G How does the tobacco industry attempt to influence marketing regulations? A systematic review PLoS ONE 2014 9 e87389 24505286 PMC3914831
  5. [10]Mamudu HM Hammond R Glantz S Tobacco industry attempts to counter the World Bank report curbing the epidemic and obstruct the WHO framework convention on tobacco control Soc Sci Med 2008 67 1690 9 18950924 PMC2662513
  6. [13]McDaniel PA Intinarelli G Malone RE Tobacco industry issues management organizations: creating a global corporate network to undermine public health Global Health 2008 4 2 18201375 PMC2265275
  7. [18]Lantis JS The life and death of international treaties: double-edged diplomacy and the politics of ratification in comparative perspective 2009 Oxford University Press Oxford
  8. [20]Mamudu HM Gonzalez M Glantz S The nature, scope, and development of the global tobacco control epistemic community Am J Public Health 2011 101 2044 54 21940926 PMC3207640
  9. [21]Wipfli H Huang G Power of the process: evaluating the impact of the framework convention on tobacco control negotiations Health Policy 2011 100 107 15 20851492
  10. [22]Wipfli HL Fujimoto K Valente TW Global tobacco control diffusion: the case of the framework convention on tobacco control Am J Public Health 2010 100 1260 6 20466967 PMC2882412
  11. [24]Leischow SJ Ayo-Yusuf O Backinger CL Converging research needs across framework convention on tobacco control articles: making research relevant to global tobacco control practice and policy Nicotine Tob Res 2012 15 761 6 22990225 PMC3693497
  12. [25]Callard C Follow the money: how the billions of dollars that flow from smokers in poor nations to companies in rich nations greatly exceed funding for global tobacco control and what might be done about it Tob Control 2010 19 285 90 20610436 PMC2975973
  13. [26]Stoklosa M Ross H Tobacco control funding for low-income and middle-income countries in a time of economic hardship Tob Control 2014 23 e122 6 24789605
  14. [27]Crosbie E Sebrie EM Glantz SA Tobacco industry success in Costa Rica: the importance of FCTC article 5.3 Salud Publica Mex 2012 54 28 38 22286826 PMC3296364
  15. [28]Blecher E The impact of tobacco advertising bans on consumption in developing countries J Health Econ 2008 27 930 42 18440661
  16. [29]Drope J Tobacco control in Africa: people, politics and policies 2011 Anthem Press New York, NY
  17. [31]Cairney P Mamudu H The global tobacco control ‘endgame’: change the policy environment to implement the FCTC J Public Health Policy 2014 35 506 17 24831675
  18. [32]Burton S Soboleva A Khan A Smoke spots: promoting smoking with social media Tob Control 2015 24 313 14 24449250
  19. [33]Friedman LC Tobacco industry use of corporate social responsibility tactics as a sword and a shield on secondhand smoke issues J Law Med Ethics 2009 37 819 27 20122118

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hiilamo, H., & Glantz, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Glantz, Stanton
Venue
Tobacco Control
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2016-07-28
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
428-433
ISSN
  • 0964-4563 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3318
OpenAlex
W2496932268
Cited by
53
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5
FWCI
9.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Tobacco Control (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (CA-87472)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
Keywords
Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, tobacco advertising ban, tobacco control policy implementation, state capacity, low-income countries, international health policy
MeSH terms
Advertising, Humans, Poverty, World Health Organization, Tobacco Products

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review