Cited by 19Helminth infection and controlParasitic infections in humans and animalsVeterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia

Efficacy, safety and palatability of a new broad‐spectrum anthelmintic formulation in dogs

Schmid, K., Rohdich, N., Zschiesche, E., Kok, D. J., Allan, M. J.·2010·Veterinary Record

Abstract

The efficacy, safety and palatability of a new flavoured chewable anthelmintic tablet were investigated in dogs. The efficacy, based on worm counts, of a single recommended therapeutic dose (RTD) of 5 mg pyrantel + 20 mg oxantel + 5 mg praziquantel/kg bodyweight was assessed in experimental infections (EI) and natural infections (NI) with Trichuris vulpis , Echinococcus granulosus and Toxocara canis . For T vulpis , the efficacy of the treatment was 99.3 per cent in EI (comparing groups of six treated and six control dogs) and 100 per cent in NI (nine treated and nine control dogs). For E granulosus , the efficacy was more than 99.9 per cent in EI (11 treated and 11 control dogs). For T canis , the efficacy was 94.3 per cent in EI (10 treated and 10 control dogs) and 100 per cent in NI (12 treated and 13 control dogs). In a field study, Ancylostoma caninum (11 dogs) and T canis (11 dogs) faecal egg counts were reduced by more than 99 per cent, and in eight dogs with Dipylidium caninum proglotides in the faeces the efficacy was 100 per cent. The tablets were readily consumed by 56 of 64 (87.5 per cent) privately owned dogs. Safety was assessed in groups of six dogs treated either once with twice the RTD, once with six times the RTD, with twice the RTD on three consecutive days, or untreated. There were no significant differences in blood parameters between the groups, and no abnormal clinical findings. Two dogs treated with six times the RTD vomited, but no vomiting was observed when administration was repeated two days later.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/vr.c4661

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Good compliance (87.5%) of owned pets treated with oral tablets containing pyrantel/oxantel/praziquantel has been documented.

    “good compliance (i.e. 87.5%) of the owned pets treated with oral tablets containing pyrantel/oxantel/praziquantel has been documented [134]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schmid, K., Rohdich, N., Zschiesche, E., Kok, D. J., & Allan, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Intervet Innovation, Zur Propstei 55270 Schwabenheim Germany
  • Clinvet (ZA)
Venue
Veterinary Record
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-10
Volume
167
Issue
17
Pages
647-651
ISSN
  • 0042-4900 (ISSN-L)
  • 2042-7670
OpenAlex
W2104839991
Cited by
19
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Veterinary Record (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
European Commission
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Parasitic infections in humans and animals
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
Keywords
anthelmintic efficacy, pyrantel, praziquantel, dogs, Trichuris vulpis, Echinococcus granulosus, Toxocara canis, Ancylostoma caninum, Dipylidium caninum, experimental infection, natural infection, fecal egg count, drug safety, palatability, dose escalation
MeSH terms
Animals, Anthelmintics, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Drug Resistance, Drug Therapy, Combination, Feces, Female, Helminthiasis, Animal, Male, Parasite Egg Count, Praziquantel, Pyrantel, Taste, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review