Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 340

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Learning in the Presence of Malicious Errors

Kearns, Michael, Li, Ming·1993·SIAM Journal on Computing

Abstract

In this paper an extension of the distribution-free model of learning introduced by Valiant [Comm. ACM, 27(1984), pp. 1134–1142] that allows the presence of malicious errors in the examples given to a learning algorithm is studied. Such errors are generated by an adversary with unbounded computational power and access to the entire history of the learning algorithm’s computation. Thus, a worst-case model of errors is studied. The results of this research include general methods for bounding the rate of error tolerable by any learning algorithm, efficient algorithms tolerating nontrivial rates of malicious errors, and equivalences between problems of learning with errors and standard combinatorial optimization problems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1137/0222052

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Cited by

See all 340

Metadata

Authors
Kearns, M., & Li, M.
Venue
SIAM Journal on Computing
Published
1993-08
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
807-837
ISSN
  • 0097-5397 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-7111
OpenAlex
W1968998685
Cited by
340
References
13
FWCI
13.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning in the Presence of Malicious Errors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/0222052
The paper
Kearns, M., & Li, M. (1993). Learning in the Presence of Malicious Errors. SIAM Journal on Computing. https://doi.org/10.1137/0222052

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.