The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fuzzy Extractors: How to Generate Strong Keys from Biometrics and Other Noisy Data
Open accessAbstract
We provide formal definitions and efficient secure techniques for turning noisy information into keys usable for any cryptographic application, and, in particular, reliably and securely authenticating biometric data. Our techniques apply not just to biometric information, but to any keying material that, unlike traditional cryptographic keys, is (1) not reproducible precisely and (2) not distributed uniformly. We propose two primitives: a fuzzy extractor reliably extracts nearly uniform randomness R from its input; the extraction is error-tolerant in the sense that R will be the same even if the input changes, as long as it remains reasonably close to the original. Thus, R can be used as a key in a cryptographic application. A secure sketch produces public information about its input w that does not reveal w and yet allows exact recovery of w given another value that is close to w. Thus, it can be used to reliably reproduce error-prone biometric inputs without incurring the security risk inherent in storing them. We define the primitives to be both formally secure and versatile, generalizing much prior work. In addition, we provide nearly optimal constructions of both primitives for various measures of “closeness” of input data, such as Hamming distance, edit distance, and set difference.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x · Cited by 88,486
New hash functions and their use in authentication and set equality
Wegman, M. N., & Carter, J. L. (1981) · Journal of Computer and System Sciences · doi:10.1016/0022-0000(81)90033-7 · Cited by 1,402
Cited by
Lossy Trapdoor Functions and Their Applications
Peikert, C., & Waters, B. (2011) · SIAM Journal on Computing · doi:10.1137/080733954 · Cited by 649
PUF Modeling Attacks on Simulated and Silicon Data
Ruhrmair, U., Solter, J., Sehnke, F., Xu, X., Mahmoud, A., Stoyanova, V., Dror, G., Schmidhuber, J., Burleson, W., & Devadas, S. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2013.2279798 · Cited by 637
Detection of Algebraic Manipulation with Applications to Robust Secret Sharing and Fuzzy Extractors
Cramer, R., Dodis, Y., Fehr, S., Padró, C., & Wichs, D. (2008) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-78967-3_27 · Cited by 259
Self-citationBiometric template transformation: a security analysis
Nagar, A., Nandakumar, K., & Jain, A. K. (2010) · SPIE Proceedings · doi:10.1117/12.839976 · Cited by 167
Metadata
- Authors
- Dodis, Y., Ostrovsky, R., Reyzin, L., & Smith, A.
- Venue
- SIAM Journal on Computing
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 97-139
- ISSN
- 0097-5397 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-7111
- OpenAlex
- W2146813141
- Cited by
- 1,717
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 144.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fuzzy Extractors: How to Generate Strong Keys from Biometrics and Other Noisy Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/060651380
- The paper
- Dodis, Y., Ostrovsky, R., Reyzin, L., & Smith, A. (2008). Fuzzy Extractors: How to Generate Strong Keys from Biometrics and Other Noisy Data. SIAM Journal on Computing. https://doi.org/10.1137/060651380
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.