Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 352

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Influence Maximization in Social Networks When Negative Opinions May Emerge and Propagate

Open access
Chen, Wei, Collins, Alex, Cummings, Rachel, Ke, Te, Liu, Zhenming, Rincon, David, Sun, Xiaorui, Wang, Yajun, Wei, Wei, Yuan, Yifei·2011·Proceedings of the 2011 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining

Abstract

Influence maximization, defined by Kempe, Kleinberg, and Tardos (2003), is the problem of finding a small set of seed nodes in a social network that maximizes the spread of influence under certain influence cascade models. In this paper, we propose an extension to the independent cascade model that incorporates the emergence and propagation of negative opinions. The new model has an explicit parameter called quality factor to model the natural behavior of people turning negative to a product due to product defects. Our model incorporates negativity bias (negative opinions usually dominate over positive opinions) commonly acknowledged in the social psychology literature. The model maintains some nice properties such as submodularity, which allows a greedy approximation algorithm for maximizing positive influence within a ratio of 1 – 1/e. We define a quality sensitivity ratio (qs-ratio) of influence graphs and show a tight bound of on the qs-ratio, where n is the number of nodes in the network and k is the number of seeds selected, which indicates that seed selection is sensitive to the quality factor for general graphs. We design an efficient algorithm to compute influence in tree structures, which is nontrivial due to the negativity bias in the model. We use this algorithm as the core to build a heuristic algorithm for influence maximization for general graphs. Through simulations, we show that our heuristic algorithm has matching influence with a standard greedy approximation algorithm while being orders of magnitude faster.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1137/1.9781611972818.33

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Cited by

See all 352

Metadata

Authors
Chen, W., Collins, A., Cummings, R., Ke, T., Liu, Z., Rincon, D., Sun, X., Wang, Y., Wei, W., & Yuan, Y.
Venue
Proceedings of the 2011 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining
Published
2011-04-28
Pages
379-390
OpenAlex
W1567923358
Cited by
352
References
24
FWCI
18.07
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influence Maximization in Social Networks When Negative Opinions May Emerge and Propagate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/1.9781611972818.33
The paper
Chen, W., Collins, A., Cummings, R., Ke, T., Liu, Z., Rincon, D., Sun, X., Wang, Y., Wei, W., & Yuan, Y. (2011). Influence Maximization in Social Networks When Negative Opinions May Emerge and Propagate. Proceedings of the 2011 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining. https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611972818.33

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.