Cited by 72Statistical Methods and InferenceSpatial and Panel Data AnalysisAdvanced Statistical Methods and Models

Sparse Group Lasso: Consistency and Climate Applications

Open access
Chatterjee, Soumyadeep, Steinhaeuser, Karsten, Banerjee, Arindam, Chatterjee, Snigdhansu, Ganguly, Auroop·2012·Proceedings of the 2012 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining

Abstract

The design of statistical predictive models for climate data gives rise to some unique challenges due to the high dimensionality and spatio-temporal nature of the datasets, which dictate that models should exhibit parsimony in variable selection. Recently, a class of methods which promote structured sparsity in the model have been developed, which is suitable for this task. In this paper, we prove theoretical statistical consistency of estimators with tree-structured norm regularizers. We consider one particular model, the Sparse Group Lasso (SGL), to construct predictors of land climate using ocean climate variables. Our experimental results demonstrate that the SGL model provides better predictive performance than the current state-of-the-art, remains climatologically interpretable, and is robust in its variable selection.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1137/1.9781611972825.5

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In recent work, using sparse group Lasso to model climate variables ensured that if a location is selected, all climate variables observed at that location are used as relevant features.

    “By treating the set of variables observed at every location as a group, the use of group Lasso ensured that if a location is selected, all of the climate variables observed at that location will be used as relevant features.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. R. Jenatton, J. Mairal, G. Obozinski, and F. Bach, "Proxi- mal methods for sparse hierarchical dictionary learning," in ICML, June 2010, pp. 487-494.
  2. R. T. Rockafellar, Convex Analysis. Princeton University Press, 1996.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chatterjee, S., Steinhaeuser, K., Banerjee, A., Chatterjee, S., & Ganguly, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Northeastern University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2012 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining
Published
2012-04-26
Pages
47-58
OpenAlex
W2400197280
Cited by
72
References
30
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
16.93
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0851705, 0916750, CAREER, 1029711, 0953274, 0812183)
  • University of Minnesota
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
Keywords
sparse group lasso, structured sparsity, statistical consistency, feature selection, climate modeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review