The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Causal Network Inference by Optimal Causation Entropy
Open accessAbstract
The broad abundance of time series data, which is in sharp contrast to limited knowledge of the underlying network dynamic processes that produce such observations, calls for a rigorous and efficient method of causal network inference. Here we develop mathematical theory of causation entropy, an information-theoretic statistic designed for model-free causality inference. For stationary Markov processes, we prove that for a given node in the network, its causal parents form the minimal set of nodes that maximizes causation entropy, a result we refer to as the optimal causation entropy principle. Furthermore, this principle guides us in developing computational and data efficient algorithms for causal network inference based on a two-step discovery and removal algorithm for time series data for a network-coupled dynamical system. Validation in terms of analytical and numerical results for Gaussian processes on large random networks highlights that inference by our algorithm outperforms previous leading methods, including conditional Granger causality and transfer entropy. Interestingly, our numerical results suggest that the number of samples required for accurate inference depends strongly on network characteristics such as the density of links and information diffusion rate and not necessarily on the number of nodes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods
Granger, C. W. J. (1969) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912791 · Cited by 22,989
Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems
Bullmore, E., & Sporns, O. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2575 · Cited by 11,820
Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference
Pearl, J. (2009) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511803161 · Cited by 11,653
Newman, M. (2010) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199206650.001.0001 · Cited by 6,595
Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods
Granger, C. W. J. (2010) · Essays in Econometrics · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511753978.002 · Cited by 4,762
Causation, Prediction, and Search
Spirtes, P., Glymour, C., & Scheines, R. (2001) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1754.001.0001 · Cited by 4,521
Lauritzen, S. L. (1996) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198522195.001.0001 · Cited by 2,976
Dynamical Processes on Complex Networks
Barrat, A., Barthélemy, M., & Vespignani, A. (2008) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511791383 · Cited by 2,704 · cited 2×
“One important line of research focuses on exploring the role of network structure in determining the dynamic properties of a system [6, 17, 18, 19, 27, 55, 67, 79] and utilizing such knowledge in controlling network dynamics [15, 70] and optimizing network performance [13, 38, 50, 56, 72].”
BackgroundEstimation of entropy and mutual information
Paninski, L. (2003) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976603321780272 · Cited by 1,442
Lasota, A., & Mackey, M. C. (1994) · Applied Mathematical Sciences · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4286-4 · Cited by 1,353
Cited by
Detecting and quantifying causal associations in large nonlinear time series datasets
Runge, J., Nowack, P., Kretschmer, M., Flaxman, S., & Sejdinovic, D. (2019) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aau4996 · Cited by 979
Causal network reconstruction from time series: From theoretical assumptions to practical estimation
Runge, J. (2018) · Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science · doi:10.1063/1.5025050 · Cited by 422
Data based identification and prediction of nonlinear and complex dynamical systems
Wang, W.-X., Lai, Y.-C., & Grebogi, C. (2016) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.06.004 · Cited by 299
Inferring Causal Gene Regulatory Networks from Coupled Single-Cell Expression Dynamics Using Scribe
Qiu, X., Rahimzamani, A., Wang, L., Ren, B., Mao, Q., Durham, T., McFaline-Figueroa, J. L., Saunders, L., Trapnell, C., & Kannan, S. (2020) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2020.02.003 · Cited by 185
Modes of information flow in collective cohesion
Sattari, S., Basak, U. S., James, R. G., Perrin, L. W., Crutchfield, J. P., & Komatsuzaki, T. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abj1720 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Sun, J., Taylor, D., & Bollt, E. M.
- Venue
- SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems
- Published
- 2015-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 73-106
- ISSN
- 1536-0040 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2159402338
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 11.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Causal Network Inference by Optimal Causation Entropy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/140956166
- The paper
- Sun, J., Taylor, D., & Bollt, E. M. (2015). Causal Network Inference by Optimal Causation Entropy. SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems. https://doi.org/10.1137/140956166
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.