The DOI matches its Crossref record.
ROOT PRODUCTION AND THE ESTIMATION OF NET PRODUCTIVITY
Abstract
Data on the net production of oven-dry organic matter from 28 temperate angiosperm herbaceous species and 4 temperate arboreal species were analyzed to determine the relationship between below-ground and above-ground yearly increment. Mean yearly net herbaceous production (t/ha) was 3.9 for below-ground parts, 5.9 for above-ground parts, and 9.8 total. Mean yearly net arboreal production (t/ha) was 1.9 for below-ground parts, 8.9 for above-ground parts, and 10.8 total.The mean below-ground/above-ground ratio and mean below-ground production was significantly higher for herbaceous species. Mean above-ground production was significantly higher for arboreal species. There was no significant difference between total herbaceous and total arboreal production. Productivity comparisons based only upon above-ground parts are likely to be biased in favor of arboreal species.In herbaceous species, root production decreased with age and increased from fruit crops to root and tuber crops and the below-ground/above-ground ratio increased from moist to mesic to xeric species. Arboreal species were uniform in below-ground/above-ground ratios.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes
Jackson, R. B., Canadell, J., Ehleringer, J. R., Mooney, H. A., Sala, O. E., & Schulze, E. D. (1996) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00333714 · Cited by 3,071
Litter Production in Forests of the World
Bray, J. R., & Gorham, E. (1964) · Advances in Ecological Research · doi:10.1016/s0065-2504(08)60331-1 · Cited by 1,019
Self-citationMethods of Assessing Terrestrial Productivty
Whittaker, R. H., & Marks, P. L. (1975) · Ecological Studies · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-80913-2_4 · Cited by 153
Apfelbaum, S. I., Thompson, R., Wang, F., Mosier, S., Teague, R., & Byck, P. (2022) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114576 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Bray, J. R.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Botany
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1963-01-01
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 65-72
- ISSN
- 0008-4026 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1979170500
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ROOT PRODUCTION AND THE ESTIMATION OF NET PRODUCTIVITY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/b63-007
- The paper
- Bray, J. R. (1963). ROOT PRODUCTION AND THE ESTIMATION OF NET PRODUCTIVITY. Canadian Journal of Botany. https://doi.org/10.1139/b63-007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.