Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 187

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

ROOT PRODUCTION AND THE ESTIMATION OF NET PRODUCTIVITY

Bray, J. R.·1963·Canadian Journal of Botany

Abstract

Data on the net production of oven-dry organic matter from 28 temperate angiosperm herbaceous species and 4 temperate arboreal species were analyzed to determine the relationship between below-ground and above-ground yearly increment. Mean yearly net herbaceous production (t/ha) was 3.9 for below-ground parts, 5.9 for above-ground parts, and 9.8 total. Mean yearly net arboreal production (t/ha) was 1.9 for below-ground parts, 8.9 for above-ground parts, and 10.8 total.The mean below-ground/above-ground ratio and mean below-ground production was significantly higher for herbaceous species. Mean above-ground production was significantly higher for arboreal species. There was no significant difference between total herbaceous and total arboreal production. Productivity comparisons based only upon above-ground parts are likely to be biased in favor of arboreal species.In herbaceous species, root production decreased with age and increased from fruit crops to root and tuber crops and the below-ground/above-ground ratio increased from moist to mesic to xeric species. Arboreal species were uniform in below-ground/above-ground ratios.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/b63-007

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 187

Metadata

Authors
Bray, J. R.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Botany
Published
1963-01-01
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
65-72
ISSN
0008-4026 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1979170500
Cited by
187
References
0
FWCI
16.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ROOT PRODUCTION AND THE ESTIMATION OF NET PRODUCTIVITY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/b63-007
The paper
Bray, J. R. (1963). ROOT PRODUCTION AND THE ESTIMATION OF NET PRODUCTIVITY. Canadian Journal of Botany. https://doi.org/10.1139/b63-007

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.