Cited by 17Microplastics and Plastic PollutionPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental ImpactsAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics

Microplastics in subsurface water and zooplankton from eight lakes in British Columbia

Klasios, Natasha, Tseng, Michelle·2023·Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences

Abstract

Microplastics are a global contaminant of concern, but we have little information on the characteristics and bioavailability of these pollutants in western Canadian lakes. Here, we quantify and characterize microplastics in subsurface water and zooplankton from eight lakes in BC, Canada. By sampling water and zooplankton, we provide insight into the fraction of microplastics entering the food web. We found 0.607 ± 0.153 microplastics per litre in subsurface water, 0.01 ± 0.011 microplastics per copepod, and 0.02 ± 0.014 microplastics per Daphnia. Microplastic pollution was similar in all lakes sampled and showed no relationship with local population density. Fibers were the dominant morphology observed in all lakes, and Raman spectroscopy identified polyester as the dominant polymer found both in lakes and within zooplankton. Zooplankton generally ingested microplastics that were shorter than their body length and that fell on the smaller end of the range of available microplastics. The prominence of polyester fibers and PET films and fragments suggests that the likely sources of microplastics to these lakes are recreational activities and atmospheric deposition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/cjfas-2022-0293

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Polyester microplastic fibers are one of the most dominant morphologies and polymer types found in the environment and within organisms.

    “We chose to investigate the effects of polyester microplastic fibers because they are one of the most dominant morphologies and polymer types found in the environment (Klasios & Tseng, 2023;Napper et al., 2023) and within organisms (Rebelein et al., 2021).”
  • The size of the fibers used in the experiment falls within the documented range of fiber sizes found within zooplankton.

    “A broad size range of fibers has been found within zooplankton (Jemec et al., 2016;Kim et al., 2021;Klasios & Tseng, 2023;Md Amin et al., 2020), and the size of the fibers used in our experiment falls within this documented range.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klasios, N., & Tseng, M.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Venue
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
Published
2023-08-01
Volume
80
Issue
8
Pages
1248-1267
ISSN
  • 0706-652X (ISSN-L)
  • 1205-7533
OpenAlex
W4360992384
Cited by
17
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Keywords
microplastics, groundwater, zooplankton, copepods, Daphnia, polyester fibers, microplastic ingestion, food web transfer, lake pollution, British Columbia lakes, atmospheric deposition, microplastic morphology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review