Seasonal diet of the northern river otter (Lontra canadensis): what drives prey selection?
Abstract
Diet of the northern river otter (Lontra canadensis (Schreber, 1777)) has been examined throughout much of its range and across many habitat types. Few studies have examined prey selection based on prey abundance estimates, however, and prey selection results have been inconsistent. We determined composition, seasonal variation, and prey selection of otter diet in northern Utah comprising multiple habitat types and prey communities. We evaluated the hypothesis that otters take prey according to availability and in inverse proportion to swimming ability. Fish was the primary class of prey taken by otters (96.5%), followed by crustaceans (16.9%). Among families, otter diet was composed primarily of Salmonidae and Cottidae, the two families that dominated the fish community of the main-channel habitat. Otter diet varied seasonally for nearly all classes (G[24] = 127.8, P < 0.001) and families (G[18] = 132.94, P < 0.001) of prey. In particular, fish occurrence was lower during summer than during other seasons (P ≤ 0.05), whereas crustacean (i.e., crayfish (Astacoidea)) occurrence was higher (G[3] = 71.1, P < 0.001). At the family level, occurrence of Salmonidae was greatest during fall (G[3] = 11.7, P < 0.01). Within one of our habitat types, we found otters to select for prey in proportion to abundance and in inverse proportion to swimming ability, with otters selecting for Catostomidae and Cyprinidae, against Salmonidae, and Cottidae according to its abundance. We conclude that…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In primary freshwater habitats, the primary determinant of prey selection is almost always movement speed, with river otters selecting for slower species that are easier to capture and restrain.
“In these habitats, however, the primary determinant of prey selection is almost always movement speed, with river otters selecting for slower species that are easier to capture and restrain (Ryder 1955; Day et al. 2015).”
From River Otter Predation of Nesting Seabirds Along the Coasts of North America (2025) · cites this paper as Day et al. 2015
River otters generally select for benthic, slow-moving aquatic prey available in high abundance, suggesting that they rely on a "risk averse" foraging strategy that focuses on consistently catchable prey rather than targeting species that might provide a greater energetic reward per capture.
“River otters generally select for benthic, slow‐moving aquatic prey available in high abundance (Ryder 1955; Cote et al. 2008; Day et al. 2015), suggesting that they rely on a “risk averse” foraging strategy that focuses on consistently catchable prey rather than targeting species that might provide a greater energetic reward per capture (Pyke 1984).”
From River Otter Predation of Nesting Seabirds Along the Coasts of North America (2025) · cites this paper as Day et al. 2015
Cites
Sea Otters and Kelp Forests in Alaska: Generality and Variation in a Community Ecological Paradigm
Estes, J. A., & Duggins, D. O. (1995) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/2937159 · Cited by 798 · see citing works
Optimal foraging in great tits (parus major)
COWIE, R. J. (1977) · Nature · doi:10.1038/268137a0 · Cited by 395 · see citing works
Restoring Yellowstone’s aspen with wolves
Ripple, W. J., & Beschta, R. L. (2007) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2007.05.006 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
River Otter Predation of Nesting Seabirds Along the Coasts of North America
Stuntz, L., & Orben, R. A. (2025) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.72118
- Authors
- Day, C. C., Westover, M. D., & McMillan, B. R.
- Affiliations
- Brigham Young University (US)
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Zoology
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 2015-03
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 197-205
- ISSN
- 0008-4301 (ISSN-L)
- 1480-3283
- OpenAlex
- W1995292736
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 1.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Canadian Journal of Zoology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Utah Division of Wildlife Resources
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
- Keywords
- Lontra canadensis, seasonal diet, prey selection, prey availability, fish predation, salmonids, Cottidae, crayfish, Crustacea, swimming ability, habitat type, northern Utah
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review