Cited by 319Wildlife Ecology and ConservationRangeland and Wildlife ManagementEcology and biodiversity studies

Restoring Yellowstone’s aspen with wolves

Ripple, William J., Beschta, Robert L.·2007·Biological Conservation

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.05.006

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The five-tallest method does not give a representative estimate of the aspen population response.

    “Our results suggest that these published trends overestimate trends in the aspen population at large, affirming Ripple & Beschta's (2007) early acknowledgement that the 5T method does not provide a representative estimate of the aspen population response.”
  • The five-tallest method allowed Ripple and Beschta (2007) to document the first significant growth of young aspen in over half a century.

    “While we agree that 5T sampling allowed Ripple and Beschta (2007) to document 'the first significant growth of young aspen in over half century', the occurrence of a height increase says little about the strength of the wolf-elk-aspen trophic cascade, which was the central focus of Brice et al. (2022).”
  • Aspen is one of several northern range plant communities reported to be involved in a trophic cascade, but those reports have been criticized as artifacts of biased sampling.

    “Aspen is one of several NR vegetative communities reported to have been involved in a trophic cascade (Ripple et al. 2001, Ripple & Beschta 2007, Ripple et al. 2013).Those reports have been celebrated as well as criticized (e.g., Kauffman et al. 2010, Eisenberg et al. 2013), in particular, for being an artifact of biased sampling (Winnie 2012, Kauffman et al. 2013).”

    From Trophic Cascades in a Multicausal World: Isle Royale and Yellowstone (2014) · cites this paper as Ripple & Beschta 2007

  • Because reports of aspen recovery come from four watersheds selected a priori for having shown growth, a species-specific trophic cascade may require evidence of widespread growth, and some reports may represent only localized growth.

    “Because reports of aspen recovery derive from four watersheds that were selected a priori because they had shown growth (Ripple & Beschta 2007), not unlike 42% of the watersheds exhibiting growth just outside the park boundary, a concern is that a species-specific trophic cascade may require an observation of widespread growth.By contrast, a number of these reports may represent only localized”

    From Trophic Cascades in a Multicausal World: Isle Royale and Yellowstone (2014) · cites this paper as Ripple & Beschta 2007

  • Low densities of Rocky Mountain elk after about 2004 created conditions conducive for new aspen recruitment in YNP's northern ungulate winter range.

    “Low densities of Rocky Mountain elk (Cervus canadensis) after about 2004 created conditions conducive for new aspen recruitment in YNP's northern ungulate winter range (northern range).”

    From Bison alter the northern Yellowstone ecosystem by breaking aspen saplings (2023) · cites this paper as Ripple & Beschta, 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ripple, W. J., & Beschta, R. L.
Affiliations
Oregon State University (US)
Corresponding author
Ripple, William J.
Venue
Biological Conservation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-09
Volume
138
Issue
3-4
Pages
514-519
ISSN
0006-3207 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2143086806
Cited by
319
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 17
FWCI
19.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Conservation (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Ecology and biodiversity studies
Keywords
wolf reintroduction, elk browsing, aspen regeneration, Populus tremuloides, trophic cascades, predation risk, riparian vegetation, vegetation dynamics, Yellowstone National Park

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review