Cited by 259Geological and Geochemical AnalysisGeological Studies and ExplorationGeological and Geophysical Studies

Geologic transect across the Grenville orogen of Ontario and New York

Carr, S D, Easton, R M, Jamieson, R A, Culshaw, N G·2000·Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences

Abstract

Revised cross sections of the western Grenville Province incorporate new geologic results and reprocessed seismic reflection data. The geology is presented in terms of three tectonic elements: (1) "pre-Grenvillian Laurentia and its margin" with ca. 1740 and 1450 Ma continental arc plutons and associated supracrustal rocks; (2) "Composite Arc Belt" of allochthonous ~1300-1250 Ma volcanic arcs and sedimentary rocks; and (3) "Frontenac-Adirondack Belt" characterized by supracrustal and granitoid rocks, and anorthosites, of uncertain affinity, that may represent a distinctive part of the Composite Arc Belt or an offshore (micro)continent. Rocks of the Composite Arc and Frontenac-Adirondack belts were amalgamated with each other by ca. 1160 Ma, were then thrust over Laurentia during ca. 1080-1035 Ma and ca. 1010-980 Ma phases of convergence, and were dissected and exhumed by <1040 Ma normal faults. Penetrative deformation was restricted to that part of the pre-Grenvillian Laurentian margin that lies to the southeast of the Grenville front and parts of the accreted Composite Arc and Frontenac-Adirondack belts. The Laurentian rocks in the Grenville Province are bounded to the northwest and southeast by southeast-dipping ductile thrust and (or) normal shear zones. The Composite Arc and Frontenac-Adirondack belts to the southeast are bounded by ductile and brittle-ductile thrust and (or) normal faults that separate domains with contrasting cooling histories. Despite a long pre-Grenvillian tectonic and plutonic history, the present crustal architecture and much of the seismic reflectivity were acquired during 1080-980 Ma phases of compression and extension.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/e99-074

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • With respect to the tectonic subdivision of Carr et al. (2000), the Parautochthonous, HP, and LP belts are all components of their 'Laurentia and Laurentian Margin.'

    “With respect to the tectonic subdivision of Carr et al. (2000), the Parautochthonous, HP, and LP belts are all components of their 'Laurentia and Laurentian Margin.'”
  • The Frontenac-Adirondack belt and contiguous parts of the Composite Arc belt carry evidence for penetrative deformation and greenschist- to granulite-facies metamorphism at 1190-1140 Ma (Shawinigan orogeny), suggesting that they were amalgamated at that time.

    “The Frontenac-Adirondack belt and contiguous parts of the Composite Arc belt carry evidence for penetrative deformation and greenschist- to granulite-facies metamorphism at 1190-1140 Ma (Shawinigan orogeny), suggesting that they were amalgamated at that time (Carr et al. 2000; Hanmer et al. 2000).”
  • Carr et al. (2000) subdivided the Allochthonous Monocyclic belt of Rivers et al. (1989) into the 'Composite Arc belt' and the 'Frontenac-Adirondack belt.'

    “Carr et al. (2000) subdivided the Allochthonous Monocyclic belt of Rivers et al. (1989) into the 'Composite Arc belt' and the 'Frontenac-Adirondack belt.'”
  • The current geometry of the Composite Arc belt reflects principally thrusting and extension at c. 1080-1050 Ma.

    “However, the current geometry of the belt reflects principally thrusting and extension at c45 1080-1050 Ma (Timmermann et al. 1997; Carr et al. 2000).”
  • The boundary between the Composite Arc belt and the structurally underlying units is a map-scale tectonic mélange referred to as the Composite Arc boundary thrust zone.

    “The boundary between the Composite Arc belt and the structurally underlying units is a map-scale tectonic mélange referred to here as the Composite Arc boundary thrust zone (Fig. 2; formerly Central Metasedimentary Belt boundary thrust zone, Hanmer and Ciesielski 1984; renamed to be consistent with renaming of Central Metasedimentary belt to Composite Arc belt by Carr et al. 2000).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carr, S. D., Easton, R. M., Jamieson, R. A., & Culshaw, N. G.
Affiliations
Carleton University (CA)
Venue
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
Published
2000-04-02
Volume
37
Issue
2-3
Pages
193-216
ISSN
  • 0008-4077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1480-3313
OpenAlex
W2165925059
Cited by
259
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 10
FWCI
8.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › Geological Studies and Exploration
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › Geological and Geophysical Studies
Keywords
Grenville orogen, Grenville Province, geological cross-sections, Laurentia, anorthosite, supracrustal rocks, normal faults, exhumation, thrust faulting, ductile shear zones, crustal structure, seismic reflectivity, accretion, Grenville Front, Ontario, New York

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review