The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Arm homoeology of wheat and rye chromosomes
Abstract
Meiotic pairing was studied at metaphase I in three different cv. Chinese Spring × rye hybrid combinations (5B deficient, 3D deficient, and normal ABDR) to establish the arm homoeology of wheat and rye chromosomes. The majority of individual wheat chromosomes and their arms, as well as the arms of chromosomes 1R and 5R, were identified by means of C-banding. The results on pairing relationships support the genome reallocation of chromosomes 4A and 4B. The short arms of wheat chromosomes belonging to homoeologous groups 1, 3, 5, and 6 and of chromosome pairs 4A–4D and 7A–7D showed full pairing homoeology as well as the long arms of wheat chromosomes of groups 1, 3, 6, and 7 and of chromosome pairs 4A–4D and 5B–5D. Chromosomes 2A, 2B, and 2D were homoeologous, but the homoeologies of their arms were not identified. Reduced homoeologies of the 4BL arm to 7AS and 7DS, of the 5AL arm to 4AL and 4DL, and of the 7BS arm to 5BL and 5DL were identified. Arms 4BL, 5AL, and 7BS are involved in a double translocation that arose during the evolution of common wheat. The homoeology relationships of chromosome arm 4BS were not identified since this arm seldom paired. The homoeologous pairing pattern between wheat chromosomes was characterized by a remarkable predominance of A–D associations, altered only by structural changes in groups 4 and 5. Chromosome arm 1RL showed full pairing homoeology to 1AL, 1BL, and 1DL, while 5RL was homoeologous to 5AL and partially homoeologous to 4AL and 4DL. It is concluded that 5RL carries a translocated segment from 4RL. Key words: homoeologous pairing, translocations, wheat evolution, C-banding.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Comparative DNA Sequence Analysis of Wheat and Rice Genomes
Sorrells, M. E., La Rota, M., Bermudez-Kandianis, C. E., Greene, R. A., Kantety, R., Munkvold, J. D., Miftahudin, Mahmoud, A., Ma, X., Gustafson, P. J., et al. (2003) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.1113003 · Cited by 406
Tall fescue EST-SSR markers with transferability across several grass species
Saha, M. C., Mian, M. A. R., Eujayl, I., Zwonitzer, J. C., Wang, L., & May, G. D. (2004) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-004-1681-1 · Cited by 319
Akhunov, E. D., Goodyear, A. W., Geng, S., Qi, L.-L., Echalier, B., Gill, B. S., Miftahudin, Gustafson, J. P., Lazo, G., Chao, S., et al. (2003) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.808603 · Cited by 323
Liu, B., Vega, J. M., & Feldman, M. (1998) · Genome · doi:10.1139/g98-052 · Cited by 320
Comparative Genomics of Plant Chromosomes
Paterson, A. H., Bowers, J. E., Burow, M. D., Draye, X., Elsik, C. G., Jiang, C.-X., Katsar, C. S., Lan, T.-H., Lin, Y.-R., Ming, R., et al. (2000) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.12.9.1523 · Cited by 317
Metadata
- Authors
- Naranjo, T., Roca, A., Goicoechea, P. G., & Giraldez, R.
- Venue
- Genome
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1987-12-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 873-882
- ISSN
- 0831-2796 (ISSN-L)
- 1480-3321
- OpenAlex
- W1996182032
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Arm homoeology of wheat and rye chromosomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/g87-149
- The paper
- Naranjo, T., Roca, A., Goicoechea, P. G., & Giraldez, R. (1987). Arm homoeology of wheat and rye chromosomes. Genome. https://doi.org/10.1139/g87-149
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.