The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A methodology for estimating canopy disturbance frequency and intensity in dense temperate forests
Abstract
Analysis of the frequency of past moderate and high-intensity disturbances has been hindered in forests of complex age structure by methodological problems. A methodology is proposed for developing a disturbance chronology in such stands by identifying the probable date of canopy accession for each sample tree. Canopy accession dates are based on an evaluation of radial growth pattern and early growth rates of existing canopy trees. Canopy disturbance intensity is defined as the percentage of sample trees with canopy accession events in each decade. Rotation periods for disturbances of various intensities are calculated from the chronology. The method was evaluated using 893 increment cores from 70 plots in northern hardwood stands of western Upper Michigan. The estimated average disturbance rate for all plots and decades was 5.7–6.9% of land area per decade, with an implied average canopy tree residence time of 145–175 years. These estimates are similar to those obtained by on-site estimates of canopy tree residence time and studies in the literature on the rate of gap formation. Problems in radial increment analysis and possible solutions are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nowacki, G. J., & Abrams, M. D. (1997) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/0012-9615(1997)067[0225:rgacfr]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 512
Gap dynamics of forest trees: A review with particular attention to boreal forests
McCarthy, J. (2001) · Environmental Reviews · doi:10.1139/a00-012 · Cited by 440
Natural Disturbance Regimes in Hemlock‐Hardwood Forests of the Upper Great Lakes Region
Frelich, L. E., & Lorimer, C. G. (1991) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/1943005 · Cited by 428
Self-citationFrolking, S., Palace, M. W., Clark, D. B., Chambers, J. Q., Shugart, H. H., & Hurtt, G. C. (2009) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences · doi:10.1029/2008jg000911 · Cited by 428
Johnson, E. A., & Gutsell, S. L. (1994) · Advances in Ecological Research · doi:10.1016/s0065-2504(08)60216-0 · Cited by 414
Metadata
- Authors
- Lorimer, C. G., & Frelich, L. E.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Forest Research
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1989-05-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 651-663
- ISSN
- 0045-5067 (ISSN-L)
- 1208-6037
- OpenAlex
- W1985365132
- Cited by
- 456
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A methodology for estimating canopy disturbance frequency and intensity in dense temperate forests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/x89-102
- The paper
- Lorimer, C. G., & Frelich, L. E. (1989). A methodology for estimating canopy disturbance frequency and intensity in dense temperate forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. https://doi.org/10.1139/x89-102
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.