The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Natural Disturbance Regimes in Hemlock‐Hardwood Forests of the Upper Great Lakes Region
Abstract
The frequency of natural disturbances and their influence on the forest landscape mosaic were investigated on three large tracts of primary forest in Upper Michigan. Seventy 0.5—ha plots were randomly distributed in a total forest area of 23 000 ha dominated by sugar maple (Acer saccharum) and eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis). Radial increment patterns were used to estimate canopy accession dates for each of a number of randomly selected overstory trees on each plot. From these data a disturbance chronology, representing the percentage of stand area occupied by cohorts originating during each decade over the last 130 yr, was compiled for each plot. Average rates of disturbance or canopy mortality are estimated at 5.7 to 6.9% per decade. The corresponding average canopy residence time of a tree is 145—175 yr. No significant differences were detected in average disturbance rates among the three study areas, between plots near the coast of Lake Superior and inland plots, among several different aspects, and among several different slope positions. Natural rotation periods increase exponentially with increasing disturbance intensity, which is defined as the approximate percentage of the plot area converted to gaps during a disturbance episode. Estimates of rotation periods range from 69 yr for ≥10% canopy removal to 1920 yr for ≥60% canopy removal. Spatial autocorrelation analysis indicated that plots with light and medium disturbances (<40%) are randomly distributed over the landscape. Plots wit heavy disturbances (≥40%) are clustered with a patch radius of ≈2 km, consistent with the sizes of thunderstorm downbursts. The data indicate that light and medium disturbances dominate the disturbance regime. The majority of stands on the landscape are composed of several major and many minor age classes. Even—aged stands with one predominant age class are uncommon. The age distribution of individual patches or cohorts in the two larger study areas (14 500 and 6073 ha) follows a nearly uniform distribution. None of the three study areas had more than 15% of the forest area converted to gaps in a single decade. The two larger areas meet most of the criteria that have been proposed for equilibrium landscapes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Connell, J. H., & Slatyer, R. O. (1977) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283241 · Cited by 4,378
CURTIS, J. T. (1960) · Soil Science · doi:10.1097/00010694-196003000-00012 · Cited by 1,200
Shugart, H. H. (1984) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-8748-8 · Cited by 1,108
Fire in the Virgin Forests of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area, Minnesota
Heinselman, M. L. (1973) · Quaternary Research · doi:10.1016/0033-5894(73)90003-3 · Cited by 1,016
Patterns of Disturbance in Some Old‐Growth Mesic Forests of Eastern North America
Runkle, J. R. (1982) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1938878 · Cited by 955
Fire and Landscape Diversity in Subalpine Forests of Yellowstone National Park
Romme, W. H. (1982) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/1942611 · Cited by 692
Patch dynamics and the design of nature reserves
Pickett, S. T. A., & Thompson, J. N. (1978) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/0006-3207(78)90016-2 · Cited by 628
The Ecology of Secondary Succession
Horn, H. S. (1974) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.05.110174.000325 · Cited by 548
Disturbance Regimes in Temperate Forests
RUNKLE, J. R. (1985) · The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-050495-7.50007-7 · Cited by 520
A methodology for estimating canopy disturbance frequency and intensity in dense temperate forests
Lorimer, C. G., & Frelich, L. E. (1989) · Canadian Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1139/x89-102 · Cited by 456
Self-citation
Cited by
Landscape Ecology: What Is the State of the Science?
Turner, M. G. (2005) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102003.152614 · Cited by 990
The disturbance of forest ecosystems: the ecological basis for conservative management
Attiwill, P. M. (1994) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/0378-1127(94)90114-7 · Cited by 853
Assessing the consequences of global change for forest disturbance from herbivores and pathogens
Ayres, M. P., & Lombardero, M. J. (2000) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/s0048-9697(00)00528-3 · Cited by 788
Bugmann, H. (2001) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1023/a:1012525626267 · Cited by 697
The Search for Generality in Studies of Disturbance and Ecosystem Dynamics
White, P. S., & Jentsch, A. (2001) · Progress in Botany · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-56849-7_17 · Cited by 599
Metadata
- Authors
- Frelich, L. E., & Lorimer, C. G.
- Venue
- Ecological Monographs
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1991-06
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 145-164
- ISSN
- 0012-9615 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7015
- OpenAlex
- W1982757024
- Cited by
- 428
- References
- 38
- FWCI
- 7.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Natural Disturbance Regimes in Hemlock‐Hardwood Forests of the Upper Great Lakes Region. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1943005
- The paper
- Frelich, L. E., & Lorimer, C. G. (1991). Natural Disturbance Regimes in Hemlock‐Hardwood Forests of the Upper Great Lakes Region. Ecological Monographs. https://doi.org/10.2307/1943005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.