Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 287

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

LIMITATIONS ON THE STATISTICAL DESCRIPTION OF BLACK HOLES

PRESKILL, JOHN, SCHWARZ, PATRICIA, SHAPERE, ALFRED, TRIVEDI, SANDIP, WILCZEK, FRANK·1991·Modern Physics Letters A

Abstract

We argue that the description of a block hole as a statistical (thermal) object must break down as the extreme (zero-temperature) limit is a approached, due to uncontrollable thermodynamic fluctuatations. For the recently discovered charged black holes, the analysis is significantly different, but again indicates that a statistical decription of the extreme hole is inappropriate. These holes invite a more normal elementary particle interpretation than is possible for Reissner-Nordström hole.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1142/s0217732391002773

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 287

Metadata

Authors
PRESKILL, J., SCHWARZ, P., SHAPERE, A., TRIVEDI, S., & WILCZEK, F.
Venue
Modern Physics Letters A
Published
1991-08-30
Volume
06
Issue
26
Pages
2353-2361
ISSN
  • 0217-7323 (ISSN-L)
  • 1793-6632
OpenAlex
W2029345718
Cited by
287
References
0
FWCI
12.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: LIMITATIONS ON THE STATISTICAL DESCRIPTION OF BLACK HOLES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1142/s0217732391002773
The paper
PRESKILL, J., SCHWARZ, P., SHAPERE, A., TRIVEDI, S., & WILCZEK, F. (1991). LIMITATIONS ON THE STATISTICAL DESCRIPTION OF BLACK HOLES. Modern Physics Letters A. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0217732391002773

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.