Cited by 68Artificial Intelligence in EducationIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningEdcuational Technology Systems

AI Intelligence Chatbot to Improve Students Learning in the Higher Education Platform

Liu, Li, Subbareddy, Rama, Raghavendra, C. G.·2022·Journal of Interconnection Networks

Abstract

The integrated chatbot for artificial intelligence customizes the learning experience for the students in higher education platform. The chatbot tests the answers of the students and offers insights for the students to improve their learning skills. Further, It helps to improve students’ thinking ability and expectations in higher education platform. The demanding factors for the students in the higher education platform include the need for interactive learning in a non-linear world, enhancing the thinking ability and expectations of the students. This paper proposes Artificial Intelligence Based Inquiry Evaluation Student Learning System (AI-IESLS) to increase interactive learning experience in a non-linear environment. The principal aim of this system is to improve the learning ability of the student on a specific subject using concept mapping in the chatbot. In addition, mapping has been validated for students based on the probability distribution analysis using a concept mapping. Besides, the probability graph’s curve generated by this system assesses the student’s understanding of the topic. The simulation results have been analyzed among students based on concept mapping using the AI-IESLS system in correlation with the traditional approach based on assessment ratio, feedbacks, reciprocity, timing analysis, expectation ratio, and active learning factor.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1142/s0219265921430325

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Chatbots, including ChatGPT, have the potential to significantly impact students' thinking abilities, including retention, reasoning, and analysis skills, and to foster innovation and creativity capabilities.

    “chatbots, including ChatGPT, have the potential to significantly impact students' thinking abilities, including retention, reasoning, analysis skills [19, 45], and foster innovation and creativity capabilities [83]”

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, L., Subbareddy, R., & Raghavendra, C. G.
Affiliations
  • Xinxiang University, Henan 453003, P. R. China
  • Vallurupalli Nageswara Rao Vignana Jyothi Institute of Engineering and Technology (IN)
  • Ramaiah Institute of Technology (IN)
Venue
Journal of Interconnection Networks
Published
2022-01-28
Volume
22
Issue
Supp02
ISSN
  • 0219-2659 (ISSN-L)
  • 1793-6713
OpenAlex
W4210598757
Cited by
68
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 1
FWCI
14.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Interconnection Networks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Edcuational Technology Systems
Keywords
chatbots, artificial intelligence in education, higher education, student learning, concept mapping, interactive learning, student understanding assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review