Cited by 49Online Learning and AnalyticsIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningEducational Technology in Learning

Learning at Scale

Open access
Roll, Ido, Russell, Daniel M., Gašević, Dragan·2018·International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education

Abstract

Learning at Scale is a fast growing field that affects formal, informal, and workplace education. Highly interdisciplinary, it builds on solid foundations in the learning sciences, computer science, education, and the social sciences. We define learning at scale as the study of the technologies, pedagogies, analyses, and theories of learning and teaching that take place with a large number of learners and a high ratio of learners to facilitators. The scale of these environments often changes the very nature of the interaction and learning experiences. We identify three types of technologies that support scale in education: dedicated content-agnostic platforms, such as MOOCs; dedicated tools, such as Intelligent Tutoring Systems; and repurposed platforms, such as social networks. We further identify five areas that scale affects: learners, research and data, adaptation, space and time, and pedagogy. Introducing the papers in this special issue on the topic, we discuss the characteristics, affordances, and promise of learning at scale.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40593-018-0170-7

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Scalable, adaptive online courses could give hundreds of thousands of learners access to learning resources that they would not usually have in their local educational facilities.

    “For instance, scalable, adaptive online courses could give hundreds of thousands of learners access to learning resources that they would not usually have in their local educational facilities [694].”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [694]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roll, I., Russell, D. M., & Gašević, D.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Google (United States) (US)
  • Monash University (AU)
Corresponding author
Roll, Ido
Venue
International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
471-477
ISSN
1560-4292 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2809185978
Cited by
49
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4
FWCI
4.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology in Learning
Keywords
learning at scale, MOOCs, intelligent tutoring systems, social networks in education, learning analytics, adaptive learning, pedagogy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review