Cited by 26Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationAI in Service InteractionsMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Chatbots in cancer applications, advantages and disadvantages: all that glitters is not gold

Open access
Goumas, Georgios, Dardavesis, Theodoros I., Syrigos, Konstantinos, Syrigos, Nikolaos, Simou, Effie·2024·Journal of Personalized Medicine

Abstract

The emergence of digitalization and artificial intelligence has had a profound impact on society, especially in the field of medicine. Digital health is now a reality, with an increasing number of people using chatbots for prognostic or diagnostic purposes, therapeutic planning, and monitoring, as well as for nutritional and mental health support. Initially designed for various purposes, chatbots have demonstrated significant advantages in the medical field, as indicated by multiple sources. However, there are conflicting views in the current literature, with some sources highlighting their drawbacks and limitations, particularly in their use in oncology. This state-of-the-art review article seeks to present both the benefits and the drawbacks of chatbots in the context of medicine and cancer, while also addressing the challenges in their implementation, offering expert insights on the subject.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/jpm14080877

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Concerns about misinformation, cultural insensitivity, and overreliance on AI-generated outputs were raised across multiple studies.

    “However, concerns about misinformation, cultural insensitivity, and overreliance on AI-generated outputs were raised across multiple studies [26-28].”

    From Empathic AI for Patient-Centered Cancer Care: A Scoping Review of Patient Navigation, Support, and Clinical Practice (2026) · cites this paper as [26]

    Section 4 warns that chatbots can provide inaccurate medical advice, and Section 5 says they should supplement rather than replace healthcare workers, supporting concerns about misinformation and overreliance. Section 5 discusses bias and fairness across demographic groups, but does not specifically raise cultural insensitivity. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

15 of the 98 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [21]Kocakoç I.D. The role of artificial intelligence in health care The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Governance, Economics, Finance Springer New York, NY, USA 2022 Volume 2 189 206
  2. [40]Darius Z. Hundertmark S. Chatbots—An interactive technology for personalized communication, transactions and services IADIS Int. J. WWW/Internet 2017 95 96 109 Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Darius-Zumstein/publication/322855718_Chatbots_-_An_Interactive_Technology_for_Personalized_Communication_Transactions_and_Services/links/5a72ecde458515512076b406/Chatbots-An-Interactive-Technology-for-Personalized-Communication-Transactions-and-Services.pdf (accessed on 17 July 2024)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goumas, G., Dardavesis, T. I., Syrigos, K., Syrigos, N., & Simou, E.
Affiliations
  • University of West Attica (GR)
  • Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
Corresponding author
Goumas, Georgios
Venue
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-08-19
Volume
14
Issue
8
Pages
877
ISSN
2075-4426 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4401697036
Cited by
24
References
98
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 4
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Personalized Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
chatbots, cancer care, digital health, artificial intelligence in healthcare, patient support, mental health support, nutritional support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review