The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE ROLE OF ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY IN FACILITATING "OPEN INNOVATION" OUTCOMES: A STUDY OF AUSTRALIAN SMEs IN THE MANUFACTURING SECTOR
Abstract
The open innovation approach emphasizes porous knowledge boundaries between firms and upstream suppliers, but tends to ignore questions of transformative efficiency and effectiveness once the knowledge reaches the focal organization. In this paper, we test for the significance of interaction effects between open innovation strategies and absorptive capacity, finding support for the idea that effective knowledge absorption capabilities are of vital importance in the facilitation of innovation effectiveness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393988 · Cited by 8,499
Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R & D
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2233763 · Cited by 7,530
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.507 · Cited by 6,324
Aguinis, H., Beaty, J. C., Boik, R. J., & Pierce, C. A. (2005) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.94 · Cited by 1,216
Challenges of open innovation: the paradox of firm investment in open-source software
West, J., & Gallagher, S. (2006) · R and D Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00436.x · Cited by 1,136 · cited 2×
“Other literature has compared open innovation’s benefits in negating the inwardly-focused culture of closed innovation and also extending the potential of vertical and horizontal integration (West and Gallagher, 2006).”
Hagedoorn, J., & Duysters, G. (2002) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00287 · Cited by 681
External linkages and innovation in small and medium‐sized enterprises
Rothwell, R., & Dodgson, M. (1991) · R&D Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.1991.tb00742.x · Cited by 397
Network configuration and innovation success: An empirical analysis in German high-tech industries
Gemünden, H. G., Ritter, T., & Heydebreck, P. (1996) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/s0167-8116(96)00026-2 · Cited by 376 · cited 1×
“Third, networks are very prevalent in knowledge-intensive industries, where due to questions of interoperability, standards and technological convergence, individual firms find it difficult to keep up with technologies from diverse areas (Gemünden et al., 1996).”
Background
Cited by
Naqshbandi, M. M., & Tabche, I. (2018) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.03.017 · Cited by 308
Caputo, F., Cillo, V., Candelo, E., & Liu, Y. (2019) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-07-2018-0833 · Cited by 199
Metadata
- Authors
- HUANG, F., & RICE, J.
- Venue
- International Journal of Innovation Management
- Publisher
- World Scientific Pub Co Pte Ltd
- Published
- 2009-06
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 02
- Pages
- 201-220
- ISSN
- 1363-9196 (ISSN-L)
- 1757-5877
- OpenAlex
- W2118465679
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 18.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE ROLE OF ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY IN FACILITATING "OPEN INNOVATION" OUTCOMES: A STUDY OF AUSTRALIAN SMEs IN THE MANUFACTURING SECTOR. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1142/s1363919609002261
- The paper
- HUANG, F., & RICE, J. (2009). THE ROLE OF ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY IN FACILITATING "OPEN INNOVATION" OUTCOMES: A STUDY OF AUSTRALIAN SMEs IN THE MANUFACTURING SECTOR. International Journal of Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1363919609002261
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
