The business model pattern database—A tool for systematic business model innovation
Abstract
Companies are more frequently seen shifting their focus from technological innovation towards business model innovation. One efficient option for business model innovation is to learn from existing solutions, i.e., business model patterns. However, the various understandings of the business model pattern concept are often confusing and contradictory, with the available collections incomplete, overlapping, and inconsistently structured. Therefore, the rich body of literature on business model patterns has not yet reached its full potential for both practical application as well as theoretic advancement. To help remedy this, we conduct an exhaustive review, filter for duplicates, and structure the patterns along several dimensions by applying a rigorous taxonomy-building approach. The resulting business model pattern database allows for navigation to the relevant set of patterns for a specific impact on a company’s business model. It can be used for systematic business model innovation, which we illustrate via a simplified case study.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Existing works lack clarity about the combination of multiple patterns, which is necessary for complete design.
“Lastly, they lack clarity about the combination of multiple patterns, which is necessary to the complete design since a pattern usually addresses different parts or elements of the business model [24,44].”
From Configuring New Business Models for Circular Economy through Product–Service Systems (2019) · cites this paper as [44]
Cites
The business model concept: Theoretical underpinnings and empirical illustrations
Hedman, J., & Kalling, T. (2003) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000446 · Cited by 919 · see citing works
Developing a unified framework of the business model concept
Al-Debei, M. M., & Avison, D. (2010) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2010.21 · Cited by 879 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A review and typology of circular economy business model patterns
Lüdeke‐Freund, F., Gold, S., & Bocken, N. M. P. (2019) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12763 · Cited by 1,256 · see citing works
Managerial challenges of Industry 4.0: an empirically backed research agenda for a nascent field
Schneider, P. (2018) · Review of Managerial Science · doi:10.1007/s11846-018-0283-2 · Cited by 345 · see citing works
Configuring New Business Models for Circular Economy through Product–Service Systems
P. P. Pieroni, M., C. McAloone, T., & C. A. Pigosso, D. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11133727 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
“BM literature [24,44], in two steps: (i) identification and consolidation of previously developed generic patterns of business models for CE available in literature (listed in [9]); and, (ii) retrospective analysis of more than 150 cases in six industry sectors [3].”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
- Authors
- REMANE, G., HANELT, A., TESCH, J. F., & KOLBE, L. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Göttingen, Chair of Information Management, Platz der Göttingen Sieben 5, 37073 Göttingen, Germany
- University of Göttingen (DE)
- ORCID
- KOLBE, LUTZ M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Innovation Management
- Publisher
- World Scientific Pub Co Pte Ltd
- Published
- 2017-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 01
- Pages
- 1750004
- ISSN
- 1363-9196 (ISSN-L)
- 1757-5877
- OpenAlex
- W2440756594
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 32.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Innovation Management (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Innovation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
- Keywords
- business model patterns, business model innovation, pattern classification, systematic innovation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review