Cited by 76Climate Change Policy and EconomicsEnergy, Environment, Economic GrowthEnvironmental Policies and Emissions

THE IMPACTS OF THE EU ETS ON NORWEGIAN PLANTS’ ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE

Open access
KLEMETSEN, MARIT, ROSENDAHL, KNUT EINAR, JAKOBSEN, ANJA LUND·2020·Climate Change Economics

Abstract

This paper examines the impacts of the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) on the environmental and economic performance of Norwegian plants. The ETS is regarded as the cornerstone climate policy in the EU and Norway, but there has been considerable debate regarding its effects due to low quota prices and substantial allocation of free allowances. The rich data allow us to investigate potential effects of the ETS on several important aspects of plant behavior. The results indicate a weak tendency of emissions reductions among Norwegian plants in the second phase of the ETS, but not in the other phases. We find no significant effects on emissions intensity in any of the phases, but positive effects on value added and productivity in the second phase. These positive effects may be due to the large amounts of free allowances, and that plants may have passed on additional marginal costs to consumers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1142/s2010007820500062

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
KLEMETSEN, M., ROSENDAHL, K. E., & JAKOBSEN, A. L.
Affiliations
  • Statistics Norway (NO)
  • Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NO)
Corresponding author
ROSENDAHL, KNUT EINAR
Venue
Climate Change Economics
Published
2020-02
Volume
11
Issue
01
Pages
2050006
ISSN
  • 2010-0078 (ISSN-L)
  • 2010-0086
OpenAlex
W2256617423
Cited by
76
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
6.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Climate Change Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Environmental Policies and Emissions
Keywords
EU Emissions Trading System, emission intensity, free allowances, emissions trading, climate policy, value added, productivity, emission reduction, cost pass-through, carbon pricing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review