Cited by 9Metal and Thin Film MechanicsIon-surface interactions and analysisAdvanced Materials and Semiconductor Technologies

Preparation of Multi-Layered Tungsten-Carbon Films by Ion-Beam Sputtering

Takei, Koji, Maeda, Yasushi·1985·Japanese Journal of Applied Physics

Abstract

Description de la methode. Observation par microscopie electronique en transmission de la microstructure des couches obtenues

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1143/jjap.24.1366

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Takei, K., & Maeda, Y.
Affiliations
NTT (Japan) (JP)
Venue
Japanese Journal of Applied Physics
Published
1985-10-01
Volume
24
Issue
10R
Pages
1366
ISSN
  • 0021-4922 (ISSN-L)
  • 1347-4065
OpenAlex
W2016570944
Cited by
9
References
5
Citations by year
2024: 1
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Japanese Journal of Applied Physics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Ion-surface interactions and analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Advanced Materials and Semiconductor Technologies
Keywords
multilayer films, ion beam sputtering, thin film deposition, film microstructure, transmission electron microscopy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review