The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Can you see me now?
Abstract
We present a study of a mobile mixed reality game called Can You See Me Now?in which online players are chased through a virtual model of a city by ‘runners’ (professional performers equipped with GPS and WiFi technologies) who have to run through the actual city streets in order to catch the players. We present an ethnographic study of the game as it toured through two different cities and draws upon video recordings of online players, runners, technical support crew, and also on system logs of text communication. Our study reveals the diverse ways in which online players experienced the uncertainties inherent in GPS and WiFi, including being mostly unaware of them, but sometimes seeing them as problems, or treating the as a designed feature of the game, and even occasionally exploiting them within gameplay. In contrast, the runners and technical crew were fully aware of these uncertainties and continually battled against them through an ongoing and distributed process of orchestration. As a result, we encourage designers to deal with such uncertainties as a fundamental characteristic of location-based experiences rather than treating them as exceptions or bugs that might be ironed out in the future. We argue that designers should explicitly consider four potential states of being of a mobile participant: connected and tracked, connected but not tracked, tracked but not connected, and neither connected nor tracked. We then introduce five strategies that might be used to deal with uncertainty in these different states for different kinds of participant: remove it, hide it, manage it, reveal it, and exploit it. Finally, we present proposals for new orchestration interfaces that reveal the ‘seams’ in the underlying technical infrastructure by visualizing the recent performance of GPS and WiFi and predicting the likely future performance of GPS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Structures of the Life-World
Schütz, A. (1973) · Cited by 1,528
Ambiguity as a resource for design
Gaver, W. W., Beaver, J., & Benford, S. (2003) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/642611.642653 · Cited by 1,474
Self-citationProceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
(2021) · doi:10.1145/3411764 · Cited by 1,240
The Aware Home: A Living Laboratory for Ubiquitous Computing Research
Kidd, C. D., Orr, R., Abowd, G. D., Atkeson, C. G., Essa, I. A., MacIntyre, B., Mynatt, E., Starner, T. E., & Newstetter, W. (1999) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/10705432_17 · Cited by 1,035
Developing a context-aware electronic tourist guide: some issues and experiences
Cheverst, K., Davies, N., Mitchell, K., Friday, A., & Efstratiou, C. (2000) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/332040.332047 · Cited by 961
Making sense of sensing systems: five questions for designers and researchers
Bellotti, V., Back, M., Edwards, W. K., Grinter, R. E., Henderson, A., & Lopes, C. (2002) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/503376.503450 · Cited by 405
Heath, C., & Luff, P. (1991) · Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work ECSCW ’91 · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-3506-1_5 · Cited by 348
ARQuake: the outdoor augmented reality gaming system
Piekarski, W., & Thomas, B. (2002) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/502269.502291 · Cited by 318
Seamful interweaving: heterogeneity in the theory and design of interactive systems
Chalmers, M., & Galani, A. (2004) · Proceedings of the 5th conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques · doi:10.1145/1013115.1013149 · Cited by 315
Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Ubiquitous computing
(2009) · doi:10.1145/1620545 · Cited by 309
Cited by
Strong concepts: Intermediate-level knowledge in interaction design research
Höök, K., & Löwgren, J. (2012) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/2362364.2362371 · Cited by 540
Von Schomberg, R. (2011) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2436399 · Cited by 403
Gaudenzi, S. (2013) · Goldsmiths, University of London · doi:10.25602/gold.00007997 · Cited by 132
Rodgers, M. M., Alon, G., Pai, V. M., & Conroy, R. S. (2019) · Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering · doi:10.1177/2055668319839607 · Cited by 119
Exiting the Cleanroom: On Ecological Validity and Ubiquitous Computing
Carter, S., Mankoff, J., Klemmer, S. R., & Matthews, T. (2008) · Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/07370020701851086 · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Benford, S., Crabtree, A., Flintham, M., Drozd, A., Anastasi, R., Paxton, M., Tandavanitj, N., Adams, M., & Row-Farr, J.
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 100-133
- ISSN
- 1073-0516 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7325
- OpenAlex
- W2005425904
- Cited by
- 383
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 42.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Can you see me now? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1143518.1143522
- The paper
- Benford, S., Crabtree, A., Flintham, M., Drozd, A., Anastasi, R., Paxton, M., Tandavanitj, N., Adams, M., & Row-Farr, J. (2006). Can you see me now? ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction. https://doi.org/10.1145/1143518.1143522
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.