Cited by 119Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsStroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryProsthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics

Wearable technologies for active living and rehabilitation: Current research challenges and future opportunities

Open access
Rodgers, Mary M, Alon, Gad, Pai, Vinay M, Conroy, Richard S·2019·Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering

Abstract

This paper presents some recent developments in the field of wearable sensors and systems that are relevant to rehabilitation and provides examples of systems with evidence supporting their effectiveness for rehabilitation. A discussion of current challenges and future developments for selected systems is followed by suggestions for future directions needed to advance towards wider deployment of wearable sensors and systems for rehabilitation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2055668319839607

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [26]Dorsch AK King CE Dobkin BH Neurorehabilitation technology, New York, NY: Springer, 2016.
  2. [27]Alon G Embrey DG Brandsma BA et al. Comparing four electrical stimulators with different pulses properties and their effect on the discomfort and elicited dorsiflexion. Int J Physiother Res 2013; 1: 122– 129.
  3. [53]Davis FD. A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results. PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA, 1985.
  4. [62]Orji R. Design for behaviour change: a model-driven approach for tailoring persuasive technologies. Doctoral dissertation, University of Saskatchewan, Canada, 2014.
  5. [65]Clawson J, Voida A, Patel N, et al. Mobiphos: a collocated-synchronous mobile photo sharing application. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on human computer interaction with mobile devices and services, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2–5 September 2008, pp.187–195.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rodgers, M. M., Alon, G., Pai, V. M., & Conroy, R. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • Data Collaboratory, LLC, Potomac, MD, USA
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Rodgers, Mary M
Venue
Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering
Published
2019-01
Volume
6
Pages
2055668319839607-2055668319839607
ISSN
2055-6683 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2941282874
Cited by
119
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Keywords
wearable sensors, wearable systems, rehabilitation, active lifestyle, rehabilitation effectiveness, assistive technology, future research directions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review