The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The challenge problem for automated detection of 101 semantic concepts in multimedia
Open accessAbstract
We introduce the challenge problem for generic video indexing to gain insight in intermediate steps that affect performance of multimedia analysis methods, while at the same time fostering repeatability of experiments. To arrive at a challenge problem, we provide a general scheme for the systematic examination of automated concept detection methods, by decomposing the generic video indexing problem into 2 unimodal analysis experiments, 2 multimodal analysis experiments, and 1 combined analysis experiment. For each experiment, we evaluate generic video indexing performance on 85 hours of international broadcast news data, from the TRECVID 2005/2006 benchmark, using a lexicon of 101 semantic concepts. By establishing a minimum performance on each experiment, the challenge problem allows for component-based optimization of the generic indexing issue, while simultaneously offering other researchers a reference for comparison during indexing methodology development. To stimulate further investigations in intermediate analysis steps that inuence video indexing performance, the challenge offers to the research community a manually annotated concept lexicon, pre-computed low-level multimedia features, trained classifier models, and five experiments together with baseline performance, which are all available at http://www.mediamill.nl/challenge/.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines
Chang, C.-C., & Lin, C.-J. (2011) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/1961189.1961199 · Cited by 40,918
The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory
Vapnik, V. N. (1995) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2440-0 · Cited by 39,138
The humanID gait challenge problem: data sets, performance, and analysis
Sarkar, S., Phillips, P. J., Liu, Z., Vega, I. R., Grother, P., & Bowyer, K. W. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2005.39 · Cited by 1,133
Cited by
The pascal visual object classes (VOC) challenge
Everingham, M., Van Gool, L., Williams, C. K. I., Winn, J., & Zisserman, A. (2010) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-009-0275-4 · Cited by 19,599
NUS-WIDE: a real-world web image database from National University of Singapore
Chua, T.-S., Tang, J., Hong, R., Li, H., Luo, Z., & Zheng, Y. (2009) · Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Image and Video Retrieval · doi:10.1145/1646396.1646452 · Cited by 3,025
50 Years of object recognition: Directions forward
Andreopoulos, A., & Tsotsos, J. K. (2013) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2013.04.005 · Cited by 347
Towards computational autobiographical narratives through human digital memories
Byrne, D., & Jones, G. J. F. (2008) · Proceedings of the 2nd ACM international workshop on Story representation, mechanism and context · doi:10.1145/1462014.1462017 · Cited by 24
Cost-effective Batch-mode Multi-label Active Learning
Gui, X., Lu, X., & Yu, G. (2021) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2021.08.063 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Snoek, C. G. M., Worring, M., van Gemert, J. C., Geusebroek, J.-M., & Smeulders, A. W. M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on Multimedia
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2006-10-23
- Pages
- 421-430
- OpenAlex
- W2153677638
- Cited by
- 620
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 50.33
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.