Cited by 107Digital Accessibility for DisabilitiesUsability and User Interface DesignInformation Architecture and Usability

A web accessibility report card for top international university web sites

Kane, Shaun K., Shulman, Jessie A., Shockley, Timothy J., Ladner, Richard E.·2007·Proceedings of the 2007 international cross-disciplinary conference on Web accessibility (W4A) - W4A '07

Abstract

University web pages play a central role in the activities of current and prospective postsecondary students. University sites that are not accessible may exclude people with disabilities from participation in educational, social and professional activities. In order to assess the current state of university web site accessibility, we performed a multi-method analysis of the home pages of 100 top international universities. Each site was analyzed for compliance with accessibility standards, image accessibility, alternate-language and text-only content, and quality of web accessibility statements. Results showed that many top universities continue to have accessibility problems. University web site accessibility also varies greatly across different countries and geographic regions. Remaining obstacles to universal accessibility for universities include low accessibility in non-English-speaking countries and absent or low-quality accessibility policies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1243441.1243472

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Kane et al. (2007) measured accessibility of Top 100 global University web pages.

    “A study conducted to measure accessibility of Top 100 global University web pages (Kane et al., 2007).”

    From Accessibility of Indian universities’ homepages: An exploratory study (2018) · cites this paper as Kane et al., 2007

  • In Top 100 University study and Malaysian University study, two web sites were observed with zero accessibility errors.

    “In Top 100 University study and Malaysian University study, two web sites were observed with zero accessibility errors, at the time when the studies were conducted.”

    From Accessibility of Indian universities’ homepages: An exploratory study (2018) · cites this paper as Kane et al., 2007

  • In the comparative analysis, the Indian university homepages had no website with zero accessibility errors, whereas the Top 100 University study and Malaysian University study each had two websites with zero errors.

    “| Univ with zero errors | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |”

    From Accessibility of Indian universities’ homepages: An exploratory study (2018) · cites this paper as Kane et al., 2007

  • The Indian university homepages had a total error count of 375,989, which is larger than the error counts in the Kane et al. (937), Ahmi and Mohamad (14,935), and Tahani and Steve (82,685) studies.

    “| Total error count | 937 | 14935 | 82685 | 375989 |”

    From Accessibility of Indian universities’ homepages: An exploratory study (2018) · cites this paper as Kane et al., 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kane, S. K., Shulman, J. A., Shockley, T. J., & Ladner, R. E.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2007 international cross-disciplinary conference on Web accessibility (W4A) - W4A '07
Publisher
ACM Press
Published
2007
Pages
148
OpenAlex
W2021735727
Cited by
107
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Web for All Conference (W4A) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Architecture and Usability
Keywords
web accessibility, university websites, accessibility compliance, image accessibility, multilingual content, accessibility statement, accessibility policy, people with disabilities, international universities, cross-national comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review