The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Co-clustering based classification for out-of-domain documents
Abstract
In many real world applications, labeled data are in short supply. It often happens that obtaining labeled data in a new domain is expensive and time consuming, while there may be plenty of labeled data from a related but different domain. Traditional machine learning is not able to cope well with learning across different domains. In this paper, we address this problem for a text-mining task, where the labeled data are under one distribution in one domain known as in-domain data, while the unlabeled data are under a related but different domain known as out-of-domain data. Our general goal is to learn from the in-domain and apply the learned knowledge to out-of-domain. We propose a co-clustering based classification (CoCC) algorithm to tackle this problem. Co-clustering is used as a bridge to propagate the class structure and knowledge from the in-domain to the out-of-domain. We present theoretical and empirical analysis to show that our algorithm is able to produce high quality classification results, even when the distributions between the two data are different. The experimental results show that our algorithm greatly improves the classification performance over the traditional learning algorithms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Caruana, R. (1997) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1007379606734 · Cited by 6,636
Text classification from labeled and unlabeled documents using EM
Nigam, K., Mccallum, A. K., Thrun, S., & Mitchell, T. (2000) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1007692713085 · Cited by 2,736
Domain Adaptation for Statistical Classifiers
Daume III, H., & Marcu, D. (2006) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1872 · Cited by 816
Cited by
Pan, S. J., & Yang, Q. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2009.191 · Cited by 23,387
Self-citationA Comprehensive Survey on Transfer Learning
Zhuang, F., Qi, Z., Duan, K., Xi, D., Zhu, Y., Zhu, H., Xiong, H., & He, Q. (2021) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2020.3004555 · Cited by 6,678
Pre-trained models: Past, present and future
Han, X., Zhang, Z., Ding, N., Gu, Y., Liu, X., Huo, Y., Qiu, J., Yao, Y., Zhang, A., Zhang, L., et al. (2021) · AI Open · doi:10.1016/j.aiopen.2021.08.002 · Cited by 994
Domain Adaptation Problems: A DASVM Classification Technique and a Circular Validation Strategy
Bruzzone, L., & Marconcini, M. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2009.57 · Cited by 591
Chen, Z., & Liu, B. (2018) · Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning · doi:10.2200/s00737ed1v01y201610aim033 · Cited by 154
Shabbir, S., Zhang, Y., Sun, C., Yue, Z., Xu, W., Zou, L., Chen, F., & Yu, J. (2021) · Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry · doi:10.1039/d1ja00076d · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Dai, W., Xue, G.-R., Yang, Q., & Yu, Y.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2007-08-12
- Pages
- 210-219
- OpenAlex
- W1998894210
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.19
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.