Cited by 29Digital Platforms and EconomicsOpen Source Software InnovationsDiverse Legal and Medical Studies

Governing diversity in the digital ecosystem

Darking, Mary, Whitley, Edgar A., Dini, Paolo·2008·Communications of the ACM

Abstract

The concept of ecosystem is about to be brought into the digital age where, instead of plants and animals, the digital species who roam the landscape include software components, applications, services, business models, contractual frameworks and laws. Along with understanding the nature of habitat and the significance of localisation, diversity is one of the key characteristics of a healthy ecosystem. However, encouraging diversity in the context of technology production brings with it significant challenges, and designing a framework for governance that can balance interests, address technology lock-in and enable the co-existence of diverse software production methods quickly becomes a priority, as participants in the Digital Business Ecosystem project have found.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1400181.1400211

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Platform governance consists of ground rules that regulate interactions either within one side or between multiple sides of a digital platform, balancing different interests.

    “Platform governance consists of ground rules that regulate interactions either within one side or between multiple sides of a digital platform (Cusumano & Gawer, 2002), balancing different interests (Darking et al., 2008).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Darking, M., Whitley, E. A., & Dini, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Brighton (GB)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Venue
Communications of the ACM
Published
2008-10
Volume
51
Issue
10
Pages
137-140
ISSN
  • 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7317
OpenAlex
W2108709085
Cited by
29
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3
FWCI
3.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Communications of the ACM (publishedVersion)
  • University of Brighton Repository (University of Brighton) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Open Source Software Innovations
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Diverse Legal and Medical Studies
Keywords
diversity governance, digital ecosystems, digital divide, digital inclusion, technology policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review