Cited by 48Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityExpert finding and Q&A systemsKnowledge Management and Sharing

Locating patient expertise in everyday life

Open access
Civan, Andrea, McDonald, David W., Unruh, Kenton T., Pratt, Wanda·2009·Proceedings of the 2009 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work

Abstract

Coping with a new health issue often requires individuals to acquire knowledge and skills to manage personal health. Many patients turn to one another for experiential expertise outside the formal bounds of the health-care system. Internet-based social software can facilitate expertise sharing among patients, but provides only limited ways for users to locate sources of patient expertise. Although much prior research has investigated expertise location and systems to augment expertise sharing in workplace organizations, the transferability of this knowledge to other contexts, such as personal health, is unclear. Guided by expertise locating frameworks drawn from prior work, we conducted a field study to investigate expertise locating in the informal and everyday context of women diagnosed with breast cancer. Similarities between patients' expertise locating practices and practices of professionals in workplace organizations suggest similar support strategies could apply in both contexts. However, unlike professionals, unsolicited advice often triggered patients to locate expertise. They identified expertise through various forms of gatekeeping. The high-stakes nature of problems patients faced also led them to use triangulation strategies in anticipation of breakdowns in expertise location. Based on these key differences, we explored five design additions to social software that could support patients in their critical need to locate patient expertise.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1531674.1531718

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [6]Ehrlich K Cash D Turning Information into Knowledge: Information Finding as a Collaborative Activity Proc. of Digital Libraries 1994 19 25 1994
  2. [28]Shami NS Ehrlich K Millen DR Pick Me! Link selection in expertise search results Proc. of the 2008 SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2008 1089 1092 CHI’08
  3. [32]Unruh KT Information and the Cancer Experience: A Study of Patient Work in Cancer Care Doctoral Thesis 2008 University of Washington UMI Publication No. AAT-3290610; ISBN 9780549344414

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Civan, A., McDonald, D. W., Unruh, K. T., & Pratt, W.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2009 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work
Publisher
ACM
Published
2009-05-10
Volume
2009
Pages
291-300
OpenAlex
W2107198427
Cited by
48
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
25.82
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (R01LM009143)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Expert finding and Q&A systems
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Knowledge Management and Sharing
Keywords
patient expertise, breast cancer, gatekeeping, triangulation, unsolicited advice, personal health management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review