Cited by 97Health Literacy and Information AccessibilitySocial Media in Health EducationWeb and Library Services

Blog-based applications and health information: Two case studies that illustrate important questions for Consumer Health Informatics (CHI) research

Adams, Samantha A.·2010·International Journal of Medical Informatics

Abstract

Weblogs (blogs), together with podcasts and wikis are part of the larger body of next-generation communication applications dubbed "web 2.0." Within the specific area of health care, little attention has been devoted to understanding what applications are available to the lay public and how these are being used. In this study, a literature review on blogs and blogging practices was conducted, followed by case study analyses of two separate sites that use blogging tools to help patients and other lay web end-users record health-related experiences. This paper explores the diverse purposes for which blogging applications can be (or are being) used in relation to health and introduces the idea of "health goal-oriented" blogging. The discussion focuses on relevant informatics questions that arise with respect to the use of blogs and makes suggestions for subsequent research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.06.009

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous research showed that more blogs are written by men than by women.

    “Regarding gender, our findings contrasted with previous research showing that more blogs are written by men than by women.6,7,54”
  • Health bloggers tend to be younger and better educated than the general population.

    “Like other bloggers—and like people who seek health information on the Internet2,52,53—health bloggers tend to be younger and better educated than the general population.6,7,54”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adams, S. A.
Affiliations
Erasmus MC (NL)
Corresponding author
Adams, Samantha A.
Venue
International Journal of Medical Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-06
Volume
79
Issue
6
Pages
e89-e96
ISSN
1386-5056 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2163227493
Cited by
97
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
9.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Medical Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web and Library Services
Keywords
blogs, health information, consumer health informatics, Web 2.0, podcasts, wikis
MeSH terms
Adult, Communication, Female, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Medical Informatics, Middle Aged, Weight Loss, Internet, Biomedical Research, Consumer Health Information, Young Adult, Blogging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review