The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hybrid cache architecture with disparate memory technologies
Abstract
Caching techniques have been an efficient mechanism for mitigating the effects of the processor-memory speed gap. Traditional multi-level SRAM-based cache hierarchies, especially in the context of chip multiprocessors (CMPs), present many challenges in area requirements, core-to-cache balance, power consumption, and design complexity. New advancements in technology enable caches to be built from other technologies, such as Embedded DRAM (EDRAM), Magnetic RAM (MRAM), and Phase-change RAM (PRAM), in both 2D chips or 3D stacked chips. Caches fabricated in these technologies offer dramatically different power and performance characteristics when compared with SRAM-based caches, particularly in the areas of access latency, cell density, and overall power consumption. In this paper, we propose to take advantage of the best characteristics that each technology offers, through the use of Hybrid Cache Architecture (HCA) designs. We discuss and evaluate two types of hybrid cache architectures: inter cache Level HCA (LHCA), in which the levels in a cache hierarchy can be made of disparate memory technologies; and intra cache level or cache Region based HCA (RHCA), where a single level of cache can be partitioned into multiple regions, each of a different memory technology. We have studied a number of different HCA architectures and explored the potential of hardware support for intra-cache data movement and power consumption management within HCA caches. Utilizing a full-system simulator that has been validated against real hardware, we demonstrate that an LHCA design can provide a geometric mean 7% IPC improvement over a baseline 3-level SRAM cache design under the same area constraint across a collection of 25 workloads. A more aggressive RHCA-based design provides 12% IPC improvement over the baseline. Finally, a 2-layer 3D cache stack (3DHCA) of high density memory technology within the same chip footprint gives 18% IPC improvement over the baseline. Furthermore, up to 70% reduction in power consumption over a baseline SRAM-only design is achieved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The PARSEC benchmark suite: characterization and architectural implications
Bienia, C., Kumar, S., Singh, J. P., & Li, K. (2008) · Proceedings of the 17th international conference on Parallel architectures and compilation techniques · doi:10.1145/1454115.1454128 · Cited by 3,444
Cited by
Kambatla, K., Kollias, G., Kumar, V., & Grama, A. (2014) · Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing · doi:10.1016/j.jpdc.2014.01.003 · Cited by 819
Phase-Change Technology and the Future of Main Memory
Lee, B. C., Zhou, P., Yang, J., Zhang, Y., Zhao, B., Ipek, E., Mutlu, O., & Burger, D. (2010) · IEEE Micro · doi:10.1109/mm.2010.24 · Cited by 395
Opportunities for Nonvolatile Memory Systems in Extreme-Scale High-Performance Computing
Vetter, J. S., & Mittal, S. (2015) · Computing in Science & Engineering · doi:10.1109/mcse.2015.4 · Cited by 95
Metadata
- Authors
- Wu, X., Li, J., Zhang, L., Speight, E., Rajamony, R., & Xie, Y.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 36th annual international symposium on Computer architecture
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2009-06-20
- Pages
- 34-45
- ISSN
- 1063-6897 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2064977311
- Cited by
- 333
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.58
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hybrid cache architecture with disparate memory technologies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1555754.1555761
- The paper
- Wu, X., Li, J., Zhang, L., Speight, E., Rajamony, R., & Xie, Y. (2009). Hybrid cache architecture with disparate memory technologies. Proceedings of the 36th annual international symposium on Computer architecture. https://doi.org/10.1145/1555754.1555761
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.