Cited by 3343D Shape Modeling and AnalysisComputer Graphics and Visualization TechniquesAdvanced Vision and Imaging

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Robust single-view geometry and motion reconstruction

Li, Hao, Adams, Bart, Guibas, Leonidas J., Pauly, Mark·2009·ACM Transactions on Graphics

Abstract

We present a framework and algorithms for robust geometry and motion reconstruction of complex deforming shapes. Our method makes use of a smooth template that provides a crude approximation of the scanned object and serves as a geometric and topological prior for reconstruction. Large-scale motion of the acquired object is recovered using a novel space-time adaptive, non-rigid registration method. Fine-scale details such as wrinkles and folds are synthesized with an efficient linear mesh deformation algorithm. Subsequent spatial and temporal filtering of detail coefficients allows transfer of persistent geometric detail to regions not observed by the scanner. We show how this two-scale process allows faithful recovery of small-scale shape and motion features leading to a high-quality reconstruction. We illustrate the robustness and generality of our algorithm on a variety of examples composed of different materials and exhibiting a large range of dynamic deformations.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1618452.1618521

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 44 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. 10.5555/1018408.1018699 · DOI
  2. 10.5555/1731309.1731331 · DOI
  3. 10.5555/1731309.1731326 · DOI
  4. 10.5555/1889712.1889738 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 333

Metadata

Authors
Li, H., Adams, B., Guibas, L. J., & Pauly, M.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Stanford University (US)
Venue
ACM Transactions on Graphics
Published
2009-12
Volume
28
Issue
5
Pages
1-10
ISSN
  • 0730-0301 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7368
OpenAlex
W1985290145
Cited by
334
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 24
FWCI
19.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM Transactions on Graphics (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (ITR 0205671FRG 0354543FODAVA 808515)
  • National Institutes of Health (GM-072970)
  • Stavros Niarchos Foundation (200021-112122)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
Keywords
single-view reconstruction, 3D shape reconstruction, motion reconstruction, non-rigid registration, mesh deformation, temporal filtering, dynamic deformation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review