The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A survey of design issues in spatial input
Abstract
We present a survey of design issues for developing effective free-space three-dimensional (3D) user interfaces. Our survey is based upon previous work in 3D interaction, our experience in developing free-space interfaces, and our informal observations of test users. We illustrate our design issues using examples drawn from instances of 3D interfaces. For example, our first issue suggests that users have difficulty understanding three-dimensional space. We offer a set of strategies which may help users to better perceive a 3D virtual environment, including the use of spatial references, relative gesture, two-handed interaction, multisensory feedback, physical constraints, and head tracking. We describe interfaces which employ these strategies. Our major contribution is the synthesis of many scattered results, observations, and examples into a common framework. This framework should serve as a guide to researchers or systems builders who may not be familiar with design issues in spatial input. Where appropriate, we also try to identify areas in free-space 3D interaction which we see as likely candidates for additional research. An extended and annotated version of the references list for this paper is available on-line through mosaic at address
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception
Bornstein, M. H., & Gibson, J. J. (1980) · The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism · doi:10.2307/429816 · Cited by 22,935
The human factors of computer graphics interaction techniques
Foley, J. D., Wallace, V. L., & Chan, P. (1984) · IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications · doi:10.1109/mcg.1984.6429355 · Cited by 478
Cited by
A Taxonomy of Real and Virtual World Display Integration
Milgram, P., & Colquhoun, H. (1999) · Mixed Reality · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-87512-0_1 · Cited by 390
Poupyrev, I., Ichikawa, T., Weghorst, S., & Billinghurst, M. (1998) · Computer Graphics Forum · doi:10.1111/1467-8659.00252 · Cited by 353
Augmented Reality in built environment: Classification and implications for future research
Wang, X., Kim, M. J., Love, P. E. D., & Kang, S.-C. (2013) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2012.11.021 · Cited by 293
A conceptual framework for integrating building information modeling with augmented reality
Wang, X., Love, P. E. D., Kim, M. J., Park, C.-S., Sing, C.-P., & Hou, L. (2013) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2012.10.012 · Cited by 263
Schwarz, J., Marais, C. C., Leyvand, T., Hudson, S. E., & Mankoff, J. (2014) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2556288.2556989 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Hinckley, K., Pausch, R., Goble, J. C., & Kassell, N. F.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 7th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology - UIST '94
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 1994
- Pages
- 213-222
- OpenAlex
- W2117043006
- Cited by
- 360
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.11
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.