Cited by 132Personal Information Management and User BehaviorFacilities and Workplace ManagementHuman-Automation Interaction and Safety

Why do i keep interrupting myself?: environment, habit and self-interruption

Dabbish, Laura, Mark, Gloria, González, Víctor M.·2011·Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Abstract

Self-interruptions account for a significant portion of task switching in information-centric work contexts. However, most of the research to date has focused on understanding, analyzing and designing for external interruptions. The causes of self-interruptions are not well understood. In this paper we present an analysis of 889 hours of observed task switching behavior from 36 individuals across three high-technology information work organizations. Our analysis suggests that self-interruption is a function of organizational environment and individual differences, but also external interruptions experienced. We find that people in open office environments interrupt themselves at a higher rate. We also find that people are significantly more likely to interrupt themselves to return to solitary work associated with central working spheres, suggesting that self-interruption occurs largely as a function of prospective memory events. The research presented contributes substantially to our understanding of attention and multitasking in context.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1978942.1979405

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many digital devices and platforms are designed specifically to be highly engaging, using features such as notifications, alerts, personalized content, reminders and gamification to capture, retain and maintain users' attention.

    “Many digital devices and platforms are designed specifically to be highly engaging, using features such as notifications, alerts, personalized content, reminders and gamification to capture, retain and maintain users' attention (Dabbish et al., 2011).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dabbish, L., Mark, G., & González, V. M.
Affiliations
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México (MX)
Venue
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2011-05-07
Pages
3127-3130
OpenAlex
W2033910215
Cited by
132
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
14.62
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Personal Information Management and User Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Facilities and Workplace Management
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Keywords
self-interruption, task switching, information work, prospective memory, multitasking, attention, organizational context, individual differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review