The online privacy paradox: a social representations perspective
Abstract
In this paper we present early results from a study, which aims at understanding the privacy paradox from a social representations perspective. After identifying adequate stimulus words with the help of a preliminary study, we conducted the main study using an online questionnaire. Participants were instructed to associate freely to the given stimulus words. The results of the polarity and sequence analysis of the associations provide a first valuable insight into the social representations of online privacy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research focusing on smartphone behavior and the use of mobile applications in particular remains scarce.
“while research focusing on smartphone behavior and the use of mobile applications in particular remains scarce (Deuker, 2010;Oetzel and Gonja, 2011;Zafeiropoulou et al., 2013).”
From Putting the privacy paradox to the test: Online privacy and security behaviors among users with technical knowledge, privacy awareness, and financial resources (2019) · cites this paper as Oetzel and Gonja, 2011
The contradictory behavior of privacy protection occurs because privacy, as a concept, is not yet integrated into an individual's social representation.
“According to Oetzel and Gonja (2011), the contradictory behavior of privacy protection occurs because privacy, as a concept, is not yet integrated into an individual's social representation.”
From The privacy paradox – investigating discrepancies between expressed privacy concerns and actual online behavior – a systematic literature review (2017) · cites this paper as Oetzel and Gonja (2011)
Cites
An Extended Privacy Calculus Model for E-Commerce Transactions
Dinev, T., & Hart, P. (2006) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1060.0080 · Cited by 2,640 · see citing works
The phenomenon of social representations.
Moscovici, S. (1984) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,700 · see citing works
The Privacy Paradox: Personal Information Disclosure Intentions versus Behaviors
NORBERG, P. A., HORNE, D. R., & HORNE, D. A. (2007) · Journal of Consumer Affairs · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6606.2006.00070.x · Cited by 1,526 · see citing works
The Role of Push-Pull Technology in Privacy Calculus: The Case of Location-Based Services
Xu, H., Teo, H., Tan, B. C. Y., & Agarwal, R. (2009) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222260305 · Cited by 816 · see citing works
Acquisti, A., John, L. K., & Loewenstein, G. F. (2013) · The Journal of Legal Studies · doi:10.1086/671754 · Cited by 523 · see citing works
Heelas, P., Farr, R. M., & Moscovici, S. (1986) · Man · doi:10.2307/2803128 · Cited by 458 · see citing works
E-privacy in 2nd generation E-commerce
Spiekermann, S., Großklags, J., & Berendt, B. (2001) · ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC) · doi:10.1145/501158.501163 · Cited by 454 · see citing works
Vaast, E. (2007) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2007.05.003 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Specific Processes of Social Representations
Abric, J.-C. (1996) · Papers on Social Representations · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Jung, Y., Pawlowski, S. D., & Wiley-Patton, S. (2009) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.02435 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Privacy Concerns and Information Disclosure: An Illusion of Control Hypothesis
Brandimarte, L. (2018) · Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) · doi:10.1184/r1/6471842 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kokolakis, S. (2017) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2015.07.002 · Cited by 1,229 · see citing works
Barth, S., & de Jong, M. D. T. (2017) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2017.04.013 · Cited by 798 · see citing works
“Oetzel and Gonja (2011) go a step further, stating: privacy is not yet integrated into the social presentation of a smartphone and hence, will consequently lead to failed privacy awareness.”
BackgroundBarth, S., de Jong, M. D. T., Junger, M., Hartel, P. H., & Roppelt, J. C. (2019) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2019.03.003 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Fatima, R., Yasin, A., Liu, L., Wang, J., Afzal, W., & Yasin, A. (2019) · Journal of Information Security and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jisa.2019.06.007 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
(Smart)Watch Out! encouraging privacy-protective behavior through interactive games
Williams, M., Nurse, J. R. C., & Creese, S. (2019) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.07.012 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Addressing the privacy paradox on the organizational level: review and future directions
Gotsch, M. L., & Schögel, M. (2021) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-021-00239-4 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Researching Privacy in Smart Homes: A Roadmap of Future Directions and Research Methods
Kraemer, M. J., & Fléchais, I. (2018) · Living in the Internet of Things: Cybersecurity of the IoT · doi:10.1049/cp.2018.0038 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Virtue Ethics as a Solution to the Privacy Paradox and Trust in Emerging Technologies
Bilal, A., Wingreen, S. C., & Sharma, R. (2020) · International Conference on Information Science and Systems (ICISS) · doi:10.1145/3388176.3388196 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Jiaxuan, L., Zhenyan, L., Jiewang, C., & Wang, Y. (2024) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2024.2438789 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
The Privacy Paradox in the Big Data Era? No Thanks, We Are the E-People
Vassallo, M. (2019) · International Journal of Cyber Behavior Psychology and Learning · doi:10.4018/ijcbpl.2019070103 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
[POSTER] The Social AR Continuum: Concept and User Study
Nassani, A., Lee, G., Billinghurst, M., Langlotz, T., Hoermann, S., & Lindeman, R. W. (2017) · Proceedings - International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, ISMAR · doi:10.1109/ismar-adjunct.2017.20 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Selling Who You Know: How We Justify Sharing Others’ Data
Ruckelshausen, S., Kamleitner, B., & Mitchell, V. (2024) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-024-05649-4 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Online Privacy Paradox and Social Networks
Sevignani, S., & Kreilinger, V. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-7131-2_204
Online Privacy Paradox and Social Networks
Kreilinger, V., & Sevignani, S. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-6170-8_204
Online Privacy Paradox and Social Networks
Sevignani, S., & Kreilinger, V. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-7163-9_204-1
- Authors
- Oetzel, M. C., & Gonja, T.
- Affiliations
- Vienna University of Economics and Business (AT)
- Venue
- CHI '11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2011-05-07
- Pages
- 2107-2112
- OpenAlex
- W2081067983
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.87
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Representations and Identity
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Keywords
- online privacy, privacy paradox, social representations, stimulus words, free association, polarity analysis, sequence analysis, online privacy behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
