The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inferring Networks of Diffusion and Influence
Abstract
Information diffusion and virus propagation are fundamental processes taking place in networks. While it is often possible to directly observe when nodes become infected with a virus or publish the information, observing individual transmissions (who infects whom, or who influences whom) is typically very difficult. Furthermore, in many applications, the underlying network over which the diffusions and propagations spread is actually unobserved. We tackle these challenges by developing a method for tracing paths of diffusion and influence through networks and inferring the networks over which contagions propagate. Given the times when nodes adopt pieces of information or become infected, we identify the optimal network that best explains the observed infection times. Since the optimization problem is NP-hard to solve exactly, we develop an efficient approximation algorithm that scales to large datasets and finds provably near-optimal networks. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach by tracing information diffusion in a set of 170 million blogs and news articles over a one year period to infer how information flows through the online media space. We find that the diffusion network of news for the top 1,000 media sites and blogs tends to have a core-periphery structure with a small set of core media sites that diffuse information to the rest of the Web. These sites tend to have stable circles of influence with more general news media sites acting as connectors between them.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509 · Cited by 36,135
The Art of Computer Programming
Knuth, D. E. (1968) · Cited by 16,000
Infectious Diseases of Humans: Dynamics and Control
(1992) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-117-2-174_4 · Cited by 7,746
Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network
Kempe, D., Kleinberg, J., & Tardos, É. (2003) · Proceedings of the ninth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/956750.956769 · Cited by 7,326
The Mathematics of Infectious Diseases
Hethcote, H. W. (2000) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/s0036144500371907 · Cited by 6,687
Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning - ICML '08
(2008) · doi:10.1145/1390156 · Cited by 6,680
Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso
Friedman, J., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2008) · Biostatistics · doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxm045 · Cited by 6,355
An analysis of approximations for maximizing submodular set functions—I
Nemhauser, G. L., Wolsey, L. A., & Fisher, M. L. (1978) · Mathematical Programming · doi:10.1007/bf01588971 · Cited by 4,412
Respondent-Driven Sampling: A New Approach to the Study of Hidden Populations
Heckathorn, D. D. (1997) · Social Problems · doi:10.1525/sp.1997.44.2.03x0221m · Cited by 4,409
Goodman, L. A. (1961) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177705148 · Cited by 3,606
Cited by
Social big data: recent achievements and new challenges
Bello-Orgaz, G., Jung, J. J., & Camacho, D. (2016) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2015.08.005 · Cited by 846
Ratkiewicz (2011) · doi:10.1145/1963192.1963301 · Cited by 541
The Consequences of the Internet for Politics
Farrell, H. (2012) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-030810-110815 · Cited by 387
Streaming submodular maximization: massive data summarization on the fly
Badanidiyuru, A., Mirzasoleiman, B., Karbasi, A., & Krause, A. (2014) · Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/2623330.2623637 · Cited by 300
Self-citationAnomaly Detection Using Program Control Flow Graph Mining From Execution Logs
Nandi, A., Mandal, A., Atreja, S., Dasgupta, G. B., & Bhattacharya, S. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939712 · Cited by 154
Metadata
- Authors
- Gomez-Rodriguez, M., Leskovec, J., & Krause, A.
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data
- Published
- 2012-02
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1-37
- ISSN
- 1556-4681 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-472X
- OpenAlex
- W2569283211
- Cited by
- 445
- References
- 68
- FWCI
- 25.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inferring Networks of Diffusion and Influence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2086737.2086741
- The paper
- Gomez-Rodriguez, M., Leskovec, J., & Krause, A. (2012). Inferring Networks of Diffusion and Influence. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data. https://doi.org/10.1145/2086737.2086741
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.