Cited by 283Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityMental Health via WritingKnowledge Management and Sharing

To stay or leave?: the relationship of emotional and informational support to commitment in online health support groups

Wang, Yi-Chia, Kraut, Robert, Levine, John M.·2012·Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work

Abstract

Today many people with serious diseases use online support groups to seek social support. For these groups to be sustained and effective, member retention and commitment is important. Our study examined how different types and amounts of social support in an online cancer support group are associated with participants' length of membership. We first built machine learning models to automatically identify the extent to which messages contained emotional and informational support. Agreement with human judges was high (r > 0.76). We then used these models to measure the support exchanged in 1.5 million messages. Finally, we applied quantitative event history analysis to assess how exposure to emotional and informational support predicted group members' length of subsequent participation. The results demonstrated that the more emotional support members were exposed to, the lower the risk of dropout. In contrast, informational support did not have the same strong effects on commitment. We speculate that emotional support enhanced members' relationships with one another or the group as a whole, whereas informational support satisfied members' short-term information needs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2145204.2145329

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, Y.-C., Kraut, R., & Levine, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work
Publisher
ACM
Published
2012-02-11
Pages
833-842
OpenAlex
W2106212012
Cited by
282
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
97.15
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Knowledge Management and Sharing
Keywords
online support groups, cancer support groups, member retention, dropout, emotional support, information support, social support, message analysis, machine learning classification, event history analysis, serious illness, online communities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review