Cited by 242Emotion and Mood RecognitionInnovative Human-Technology InteractionContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems

AffectAura: an intelligent system for emotional memory

McDuff, Daniel, Karlson, Amy, Kapoor, Ashish, Roseway, Asta, Czerwinski, Mary·2012·Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Abstract

We present AffectAura, an emotional prosthetic that allows users to reflect on their emotional states over long periods of time. We designed a multimodal sensor set-up for continuous logging of audio, visual, physiological and contextual data, a classification scheme for predicting user affective state and an interface for user reflection. The system continuously predicts a user's valence, arousal and engage-ment, and correlates this with information on events, communications and data interactions. We evaluate the interface through a user study consisting of six users and over 240 hours of data, and demonstrate the utility of such a reflection tool. We show that users could reason forward and backward in time about their emotional experiences using the interface, and found this useful.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2207676.2208525

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This is the first study, that the authors are aware of, that makes use of wearable, mobile sensors for detecting emotions.

    “While implicit emotion detection has been done in the past [13], this is the first study, that we are aware of, that makes use of wearable, mobile sensors for detecting emotions.”

    From Food and Mood: Just-in-Time Support for Emotional Eating (2013) · cites this paper as [13]

  • McDuff et al. found that the electrodermal activity (EDA) signal was the most beneficial for emotion detection.

    “They found that the electrodermal activity (EDA) signal was the most beneficial, which is a measure of the eccrine sweat glands [14,15].”

    From Food and Mood: Just-in-Time Support for Emotional Eating (2013) · cites this paper as [13]

  • The recognition accuracy achieved here is at par with other affect recognition systems.

    “Furthermore, we would like to highlight that the recognition accuracy achieved here is at par with other affect recognition systems [13].”

    From Food and Mood: Just-in-Time Support for Emotional Eating (2013) · cites this paper as [13]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McDuff, D., Karlson, A., Kapoor, A., Roseway, A., & Czerwinski, M.
Affiliations
  • MIT Media Lab (US)
  • Microsoft (United States) (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2012-05-05
Pages
849-858
OpenAlex
W2121557515
Cited by
242
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 2
FWCI
44.53
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Keywords
multimodal sensing, valence and arousal, engagement, user study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review