Cited by 616Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

A novel demonstration of enhanced memory associated with emotional arousal

Cahill, Larry, McGaugh, James L.·1995·Consciousness and Cognition

Abstract

The relationship between emotional arousal and long-term memory is addressed in two experiments in which subjects viewed either a relatively emotionally neutral short story (presented as a brief slide show) or a closely matched but more emotionally arousing story and were tested for retention of the story 2 weeks later. Experiment 1 provides an essential replication of the results of Heuer and Reisberg (1990) and illustrates the common interpretive problem posed by the use of different stimuli (slides) in the neutral versus emotional stories. In Experiment 2, identical slides (and sequence) were used in both the neutral and arousal stories. Two different stories were created by varying the narration that accompanied each slide. In both experiments, subjects who viewed the arousal story both experienced a greater emotional reaction to the story than did the subjects who viewed the neutral story, and subsequently exhibited enhanced memory for the story. Subjects in Experiment 2 who viewed the arousal story also recalled more slides than did the subjects who viewed the neutral story. This effect was greatest for story phase 2, the phase in which the emotional slide narration occurred. Because this enhanced retention of the story slides cannot be explained by any differences in the slides themselves, the results provide new evidence to support the contention that emotional arousal influences long-term memory in normal human subjects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/ccog.1995.1048

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Acute stress promotes memory consolidation, resulting in better memory for emotional material than neutral material.

    “Acute stress also promotes memory consolidation, which ultimately results in better memory for emotional material than for neutral material (Cahill and McGaugh, 1995;Heuer and Reisberg, 1990).”

    From Physiological feelings (2019) · cites this paper as Cahill and McGaugh, 1995

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cahill, L., & McGaugh, J. L.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Venue
Consciousness and Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-12
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
410-421
ISSN
1053-8100 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2008553814
Cited by
616
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 35
FWCI
2.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Consciousness and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (AG00096)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH12526)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
emotional arousal, long-term memory, memory enhancement, emotional memory, narrative recall, storytelling, replication, stimulus presentation format
MeSH terms
Adult, Arousal, Cognition, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Psychological Tests, Mental Recall, Reference Values

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review