The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Memory-storming: externalizing and sharing designers' personal experiences
Abstract
In this paper, we describe memory-storming, a design technique that combines oral storytelling with sketching to externalize designers' personal experiences. The proposition behind developing this method is that designers' personal experiences are a potential design resource that can trigger new design insights and ideas. This paper provides a description of our use of this method, shows how it helped us in our design research, and presents lessons learned. We claim that memory-storming is a design technique that focuses on designers' personal experiences yet complements the user focus of user-centered design.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“suggesting that stories can be a valuable tool for the design of social robots.”
From Personal Narratives in Technology Design: The Value of Sharing Older Adults’ Stories in the Design of Social Robots (2021) · cites this paper as Zhang et al., 2012
In the citing paper
“Storytelling has the potential to amplify the inclusion of older adults in co-design as it draws on memories and prior experiences to narrate perceptions of technology and potential directions for design (Berger et al., 1967; Graesser and Ottati, 1995; Zhang et al., 2012).”
From Personal Narratives in Technology Design: The Value of Sharing Older Adults’ Stories in the Design of Social Robots (2021) · cites this paper as Zhang et al., 2012
Citations
Cites
Ambiguity as a resource for design
Gaver, W. W., Beaver, J., & Benford, S. (2003) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/642611.642653 · Cited by 1,474 · cited 1×
“Additionally, the same research has discussed the importance of appropriation, and created theoretical frameworks to help understand appropriation and provide insightful design principles for future technology design [8, 9, 11, 17, 41].”
BackgroundStaying open to interpretation: engaging multiple meanings in design and evaluation
Sengers, P., & Gaver, B. (2006) · Proceedings of the 6th conference on Designing Interactive systems · doi:10.1145/1142405.1142422 · Cited by 620
Wright, P., & McCarthy, J. (2008) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1357054.1357156 · Cited by 473
Research works printed but not linked: 45
- 10.1145/1340961.1340969 · DOI
- Brandes U., 2006, IN
- Brannigan E. Narrative comprehension and film. Routledge Press London IN UK 1992. Brannigan E. Narrative comprehension and film . Routledge Press London IN UK 1992.
- Brown T. and Wyatt J. Design Thinking for Social Innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review (2010) 31--35. Brown T. and Wyatt J. Design Thinking for Social Innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review (2010) 31--35.
- Burroway J., 1999, Longman Publishing Group Press
- Buxton B., 2007, UAS
- Carmel-Arthur J. Philippe Starck. Calton Publishing Group Press London UK 1999. Carmel-Arthur J. Philippe Starck . Calton Publishing Group Press London UK 1999.
- Carroll J., 2001, Proc. ACIS
- 10.1145/1013115.1013149 · DOI
- Dewey J. Experience and Philosophic Method. Pragmatism and Classical American Philosophy Oxford University Press (1925/2000) 460--471. Dewey J. Experience and Philosophic Method. Pragmatism and Classical American Philosophy Oxford University Press (1925/2000) 460--471.
- 10.5555/1531407.1531415 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1026149119426 · DOI
- Eissen K., 2007, Bis Publishers Press
- Forty A., 1986, Thames and Hudson Press
- Fukasawa N. Naoto Fukasawa. Phaidon Press London UK 2007. Fukasawa N. Naoto Fukasawa . Phaidon Press London UK 2007.
- Fantauzzacoffin J., 2006, CHI 2011
- 10.1207/S15327590IJHC143&4_13 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.intcom.2010.04.002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/985921.985995 · DOI
- Jeppesena L. B., 2003, Consumers as Co-developers: Learning and Innovation outside the Firm, Technology Analysis and Management, 15, 3
- Kahneman D., 1999, Russell Sage Foundation Publications Press
- 10.1145/1518701.1518813 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00150-5 · DOI
- 10.1177/030631292022004006 · DOI
- Malchiodi C, 2001, Using drawing as intervention with traumatized children, Trauma and Loss: Research and Intervention, 1, 1
- McKee R., 2005, Methuen Publishing Press
- Malchiodi C., 2006, McGraw-Hill Press
- 10.1080/07421656.1995.10759172 · DOI
- 10.1145/1979742.1979581 · DOI
- Ochs E., 2001, Harvard University Press
- Parrish P., 2008, Proc. AECT
- Preece J., 2002, Wiley Press
- 10.1109/HICSS.2008.418 · DOI
- Powell D., 1990, Brown Book Group Press
- Quesenbery W., 2010, Rosenfeld Media Press
- Schank R., 1995, Northwestern University Press
- Schon D. A., 1984, Basic Books Press
- 10.1016/0142-694X(92)90268-F · DOI
- Summer Leah S., 2009, Boston University Press
- Suri J. F., 2005, Chronicle Books Press
- 10.1145/1125451.1125764 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.destud.2004.08.003 · DOI
- 10.1080/10447310802142276 · DOI
- 10.1145/1254960.1254984 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-642-03658-3_71 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
From Research Prototype to Research Product
Odom, W., Wakkary, R., Lim, Y.-K., Desjardins, A., Hengeveld, B., & Banks, R. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2858036.2858447 · Cited by 259
Self-citationOstrowski, A. K., Harrington, C. N., Breazeal, C., & Park, H. W. (2021) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2021.716581 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, X., Wakkary, R., Maestri, L., & Desjardins, A.
- Affiliations
- Simon Fraser University, Surrey, BC, Canada
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2012-06-11
- Pages
- 524-533
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 3
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review