The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nowcasting Events from the Social Web with Statistical Learning
Abstract
We present a general methodology for inferring the occurrence and magnitude of an event or phenomenon by exploring the rich amount of unstructured textual information on the social part of the Web. Having geo-tagged user posts on the microblogging service of Twitter as our input data, we investigate two case studies. The first consists of a benchmark problem, where actual levels of rainfall in a given location and time are inferred from the content of tweets . The second one is a real-life task, where we infer regional Influenza-like Illness rates in the effort of detecting timely an emerging epidemic disease. Our analysis builds on a statistical learning framework, which performs sparse learning via the bootstrapped version of LASSO to select a consistent subset of textual features from a large amount of candidates. In both case studies, selected features indicate close semantic correlation with the target topics and inference, conducted by regression, has a significant performance, especially given the short length --approximately one year-- of Twitter’s data time series.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Introduction to information retrieval
(2009) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-2715 · Cited by 12,278
Introduction to Information Retrieval
Manning, C. D., Raghavan, P., & Schütze, H. (2008) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511809071 · Cited by 11,288
Twitter mood predicts the stock market
Bollen, J., Mao, H., & Zeng, X. (2011) · Journal of Computational Science · doi:10.1016/j.jocs.2010.12.007 · Cited by 5,206
Predicting the future with social media
Asur, S., & Huberman, B. A. (2010) · 2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology · doi:10.1109/wi-iat.2010.63 · Cited by 2,081
Cited by
Social big data: recent achievements and new challenges
Bello-Orgaz, G., Jung, J. J., & Camacho, D. (2016) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2015.08.005 · Cited by 846
“They can be used to detect words related to diseases or their symptoms in published texts [108].”
BackgroundStudying user income through language, behaviour and affect in social media
Preoţiuc-Pietro, D., Volkova, S., Lampos, V., Bachrach, Y., & Aletras, N. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0138717 · Cited by 219
Self-citationSocial fingerprinting: detection of spambot groups through DNA-inspired behavioral modeling
Cresci, S., Di Pietro, R., Petrocchi, M., Spognardi, A., & Tesconi, M. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing · doi:10.1109/tdsc.2017.2681672 · Cited by 168
Tracking COVID-19 using online search
Lampos, V., Majumder, M. S., Yom-Tov, E., Edelstein, M., Moura, S., Hamada, Y., Rangaka, M. X., McKendry, R. A., & Cox, I. J. (2021) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-021-00384-w · Cited by 164
Self-citationAdvances in nowcasting influenza-like illness rates using search query logs
Lampos, V., Miller, A. C., Crossan, S., & Stefansen, C. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep12760 · Cited by 143
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lampos, V., & Cristianini, N.
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology
- Published
- 2012-09
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1-22
- ISSN
- 2157-6904 (ISSN-L)
- 2157-6912
- OpenAlex
- W2126675855
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 18.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nowcasting Events from the Social Web with Statistical Learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2337542.2337557
- The paper
- Lampos, V., & Cristianini, N. (2012). Nowcasting Events from the Social Web with Statistical Learning. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1145/2337542.2337557
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.